Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25089879›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2014

Retinal prosthetics, optogenetics, and chemical photoswitches.

Robert Marc, Rebecca Pfeiffer, Bryan Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Towards translational optogenetics.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Taking Electrons out of Bioelectronics: From Bioprotonic Transistors to Ion Channels.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Selective Manipulation of Neural Circuits.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert MarcDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States.
Rebecca Pfeiffer
Bryan Jones
University of Utah · US

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Bryan William Jones · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS USING IMODP41RR000592 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FELDHEIM, DAN L. · 1985 to 2011
$11.9M
STRUCTURAL NEUROCHEMISTRY OF RETINAL CIRCUITSR01EY002576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MARC, ROBERT E · 1985 to 2016
$8.0M
Retinal RemodelingR01EY015128 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JONES, BRYAN WILLIAM · 2004 to 2021
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR000592NEI NIH HHS EY R01 EY015128NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS P30 EY14800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015128NEI NIH HHS R01 EY02576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three technologies have emerged as therapies to restore light sensing to profoundly blind patients suffering from late-stage retinal degenerations: (1) retinal prosthetics, (2) optogenetics, and (3) chemical photoswitches. Prosthetics are the most mature and the only approach in clinical practice. Prosthetic implants require complex surgical intervention and provide only limited visual resolution but can potentially restore navigational ability to many blind patients. Optogenetics uses viral delivery of type 1 opsin genes from prokaryotes or eukaryote algae to restore light responses in survivor neurons. Targeting and expression remain major problems, but are potentially soluble. Importantly, optogenetics could provide the ultimate in high-resolution vision due to the long persistence of gene expression achieved in animal models. Nevertheless, optogenetics remains challenging to implement in human eyes with large volumes, complex disease progression, and physical barriers to viral penetration. Now, a new generation of photochromic ligands or chemical photoswitches (azobenzene-quaternary ammonium derivatives) can be injected into a degenerated mouse eye and, in minutes to hours, activate light responses in neurons. These photoswitches offer the potential for rapidly and reversibly screening the vision restoration expected in an individual patient. Chemical photoswitch variants that persist in the cell membrane could make them a simple therapy of choice, with resolution and sensitivity equivalent to optogenetics approaches. A major complexity in treating retinal degenerations is retinal remodeling: pathologic network rewiring, molecular reprogramming, and cell death that compromise signaling in the surviving retina. Remodeling forces a choice between upstream and downstream targeting, each engaging different benefits and defects. Prosthetics and optogenetics can be implemented in either mode, but the use of chemical photoswitches is currently limited to downstream implementations. Even so, given the high density of human foveal ganglion cells, the ultimate chemical photoswitch treatment could deliver cost-effective, high-resolution vision for the blind.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisAnimalsHumansOptogeneticsRetinaRetinal Degenerationblindnesschemical photoswitchesoptogeneticsprostheticsremodelingreprogrammingRetinal degeneration

Identifiers

PMID25089879
PMCPMC4210130
OpenAlexW2322663331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.