Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25089598›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2014

Salvage therapy with everolimus reduces the severity of treatment-refractory chronic GVHD without impairing disease control: a dual center retrospective analysis.

S Mielke, M Lutz, J Schmidhuber, M Kapp, D Ditz, J Ammer, H Einsele, G U Grigoleit, E Holler, D Wolff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MielkeAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
M LutzAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
J SchmidhuberDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
M KappAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
D DitzDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
J AmmerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
H EinseleAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
G U GrigoleitAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
E HollerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
D WolffDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) remains the most important cause of late non-relapse mortality post allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Although first-line treatment of cGVHD with steroids is well established, evidence for second-line treatment remains limited. Here, we report a dual center retrospective analysis of the off-label salvage treatment of steroid-refractory cGVHD with everolimus. Out of 80 patients with a median age of 50 (17-70) years, 14 (17%) suffered from mild, 39 (49%) from moderate and 27 (34%) from severe cGVHD. At the final analysis, median follow-up after introduction of everolimus was 724 (14-2205) days. Thirty-four patients (43%) required the addition of further immunosuppression during everolimus-based therapy. Global NIH Severity Score improved in 34 patients (43%), remained stable in 37 patients (46%) and worsened in 9 patients (11%). The total sum of Global NIH Severity Scores in all patients assessable was significantly reduced after treatment with everolimus (P<0.0001). Most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included infections (n=30) and thrombocytopenia (n=15). There was a single case of relapse. Everolimus-based salvage treatment of refractory cGVHD results in significant improvement of the NIH Severity Score without impairing control of the malignant disease. Finally, these preliminary results demand further verification in prospective trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEverolimusFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapySeverity of Illness IndexSirolimusEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID25089598
OpenAlexW2084912918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.