Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25089298›Full record

ReviewThe Analyst2014

Enabling robust quantitative readout in an equipment-free model of device development.

Elain Fu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Analyst, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elain FuSchool of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, USA. elain.fu@oregonstate.edu.

Funding

A high-sensitivity low-cost multiplexed immunoassay platform based on 2-dimensionR01AI096184 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YAGER, PAUL · 2011 to 2015
$5.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI096184NIAID NIH HHS R01AI096184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical constraint in the design of appropriate medical devices for the lowest-resource settings is the lack of access to maintenance or repair on instrumentation. There are numerous point-of-care applications for which quantitative readout would have clinical utility. Thus, a challenge to the device developer is to enable quantitative device readout in an equipment-free model that is appropriate for use in even the lowest-resource settings. Paper microfluidics has great potential for enabling equipment-free devices that are low-cost, operable by minimally-trained users, and provide quantitative readout. The focus of this critical review is to describe the work, starting several decades ago and continuing to the present, to enable assays with quantitative readout in a fully-disposable device.

Indexed as

ColorimetryMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsImmunoassayPaperPoint-of-Care Systems

Identifiers

PMID25089298
PMCPMC4191849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.