Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25089271›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Using adhesive glue to repair first degree perineal tears: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Tomer Feigenberg, Esther Maor-Sagie, Einat Zivi, Mushira Abu-Dia, Assaf Ben-Meir, Hen Y Sela, Yossef Ezra

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00746707 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Control Trial for the Comparison of Biologic Glue Versus Suturing for First Degree Perineal Tears

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2008 to 2011Enrolled102ConditionsGrade 1 Perineal TearsArms1. Dermabond Topical Skin Adhesive 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate, 3. traditional suturing with vicryl rapid 2X0
NCT02608671 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Skin adhesive tape compared with continuous suture in perineal skin repair after episiotomy: randomized trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled320ConditionsEpisiotomyArmsSkin adhesive tape
NCT03983343 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Skin Glues Compared to Running Sutures for Perineal Skin Repair After Vaginal Delivery. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaEmek Medical Center, IsraelRan2019 to 2024Enrolled182ConditionsPerineal TearArmsexofin®
NCT07383623 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The effect of stapler versus skin suturing on pain and wound healing after episiotomy repair in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAyşegül KanıkRan2025 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsEpisiotomyArmsstapler skin closure, absorbable suture group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tomer FeigenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trillium Health Partners, 2200 Eglinton Avenue W, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5M 2N1.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-0018
Esther Maor-SagieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Einat ZiviDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Mushira Abu-DiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Assaf Ben-MeirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hen Y SelaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yossef EzraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of adhesive glue in repairing first degree perineal tears. We conducted a noninferiority prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing adhesive glue with traditional suturing. Each case was evaluated immediately after birth and after the puerperium. The two-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test were applied to compare quantitative variables between the treatment groups. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to assess the association between qualitative variables. A total of 102 women participated, 28 in the suture arm and 74 in the adhesive glue arm. While cosmetic and functional results of adhesive glue use were not inferior to suturing, the use of adhesive glue was associated with a shorter procedure, less need for local anesthetic, less pain, and greater satisfaction. Our results suggest a novel approach for the repair of common postpartum first degree lacerations. The use of adhesive glue achieves cosmetic and functional results equal to traditional suturing and offers some immediate advantages for the patient. While further clinical trials are needed to validate our results, it is important to inform obstetrician of the possible use of adhesive glue in these very common clinical scenarios. This trial is registered with NCT00746707.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsAdultCyanoacrylatesEnbucrilateFemaleHumansLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPolyglactin 910PregnancyProspective StudiesSuture TechniquesTissue AdhesivesTreatment OutcomeCyanoacrylatesEnbucrilateoctyl 2-cyanoacrylatePolyglactin 910Tissue Adhesives

Identifiers

PMID25089271
PMCPMC4095740
OpenAlexW1973482334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.