Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25088201›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

Melanoma susceptibility as a complex trait: genetic variation controls all stages of tumor progression.

B Ferguson, R Ram, H Y Handoko, P Mukhopadhyay, H K Muller, H P Soyer, G Morahan, G J Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systems genetics analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility using the mouse model: current position and new perspective.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B FergusonQueensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
R RamThe Centre for Diabetes Research, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
H Y HandokoQueensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
P MukhopadhyayQueensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
H K MullerSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
H P SoyerThe University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
G MorahanThe Centre for Diabetes Research, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
G J WalkerQueensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susceptibility to most common cancers is likely to involve interaction between multiple low risk genetic variants. Although there has been great progress in identifying such variants, their effect on phenotype and the mechanisms by which they contribute to disease remain largely unknown. We have developed a mouse melanoma model harboring two mutant oncogenes implicated in human melanoma, CDK4(R24C) and NRAS(Q61K). In these mice, tumors arise from benign precursor lesions that are a recognized strong risk factor for this neoplasm in humans. To define molecular events involved in the pathway to melanoma, we have for the first time applied the Collaborative Cross (CC) to cancer research. The CC is a powerful resource designed to expedite discovery of genes for complex traits. We characterized melanoma genesis in more than 50 CC strains and observed tremendous variation in all traits, including nevus and melanoma age of onset and multiplicity, anatomical site predilection, time for conversion of nevi to melanoma and metastases. Intriguingly, neonatal ultraviolet radiation exposure exacerbated nevus and melanoma formation in most, but not all CC strain backgrounds, suggesting that genetic variation within the CC will help explain individual sensitivity to sun exposure, the major environmental skin carcinogen. As genetic variation brings about dramatic phenotypic diversity in a single mouse model, melanoma-related endophenotype comparisons provide us with information about mechanisms of carcinogenesis, such as whether melanoma incidence is dependent upon the density of pre-existing nevus cells. Mouse models have been used to examine the functional role of gene mutations in tumorigenesis. This work represents their next phase of development to study how biological variation greatly influences lesion onset and aggressiveness even in the setting of known somatic driver mutations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionFemaleMaleMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMultifactorial InheritanceMutationNeoplasm StagingNevusSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25088201
OpenAlexW2121257896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.