Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25087987›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2014

Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 2: challenges and recommendations.

Johnson B Lightfoote, Julia R Fielding, Curtiland Deville, Richard B Gunderman, Gail N Morgan, Pari V Pandharipande, Andre J Duerinckx, Raymond B Wynn, Katarzyna J Macura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How Do Academic Medicine Pathways Differ for Underrepresented Trainees and Physicians? A Critical Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethnic and Gender Diversity in Radiology Fellowships.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johnson B LightfooteDepartment of Radiology, Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center, Pomona, California. Electronic address: Lightfoote@msn.com.
Julia R FieldingDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard B GundermanDepartments of Radiology and Philosophy, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Gail N MorganVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Pari V PandharipandeDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andre J DuerinckxDepartment of Radiology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Raymond B WynnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Katarzyna J MacuraDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. Part 2 of a 2-part position article from the commission addresses issues regarding diversity and inclusion in the context of career choices and professional advancement. Barriers to improving diversity and representation in RRO are reviewed. Discussion focuses on the development and implementation of concrete strategies designed to eliminate the current subspecialty disparity and highlights the need for the ACR to introduce programs and incentives with targeted and achievable goals with measurable outcomes. Recommendations are made aimed at fostering an environment of inclusion and diversity, so as to secure a successful future for all members of the RRO workforce. The future of radiology will be enhanced by increasing diversity and representation in the professional workforce, which will allow us to better address the varied needs of increasingly diverse patient populations, and to mitigate disparities in healthcare access, delivery, and outcomes. By leveraging diverse backgrounds, experiences, and skills of those in RRO, we will create new, effective ways to not only educate our trainees, medical colleagues, and patients but also improve delivery of health care and our service to society.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityCareer ChoiceCareer MobilityFemaleHomosexualityHumansMaleMinority GroupsPhysiciansPhysicians, WomenPrejudiceRadiation OncologyRadiologyTranssexualismUnited StatesWorkforceDiversityhealth disparitieshealth policyradiation oncologyradiologyunderrepresented minorities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.