Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25087606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Light-induced vibration in the hearing organ.

Tianying Ren, Wenxuan He, Yizeng Li, Karl Grosh, Anders Fridberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infrared light stimulates the cochlea through a mechanical displacement detected and amplified by hair cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Advective mass transport along the cochlear coil.AIP conference proceedings · 2024
    Article
  3. The spatial buildup of nonlinear compression in the cochlea.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulating the Chan-Hudspeth experiment on an active excised cochlear segment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Minimal basilar membrane motion in low-frequency hearing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianying RenOregon Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health &Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Wenxuan HeOregon Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health &Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Yizeng LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Karl Grosh1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA [2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Anders Fridberger1] Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden [2] Center for Hearing and Communication Research, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Experimental study of the cochlear amplifierR01DC004554 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI REN, TIANYING · 2001 to 2021
$7.7M
Supplement: Active and Nonlinear Models for Cochlear MechanicsR01DC004084 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karl Grosh · 1999 to 2026
$6.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-004084NIDCD NIH HHS DC-004554NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004084NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exceptional sensitivity of mammalian hearing organs is attributed to an active process, where force produced by sensory cells boost sound-induced vibrations, making soft sounds audible. This process is thought to be local, with each section of the hearing organ capable of amplifying sound-evoked movement, and nearly instantaneous, since amplification can work for sounds at frequencies up to 100 kHz in some species. To test these fundamental precepts, we developed a method for focally stimulating the living hearing organ with light. Light pulses caused intense and highly damped mechanical responses followed by traveling waves that developed with considerable delay. The delayed response was identical to movements evoked by click-like sounds. This shows that the active process is neither local nor instantaneous, but requires mechanical waves traveling from the cochlear base toward its apex. A physiologically-based mathematical model shows that such waves engage the active process, enhancing hearing sensitivity.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBasilar MembraneComputer SimulationGerbillinaeHair Cells, Auditory, OuterHearingInfrared RaysLasersLightLinear ModelsPhotic StimulationSoundTectorial MembraneVibration

Identifiers

PMID25087606
PMCPMC4120310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.