Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25087599›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye.

Angela-Maria Bernal-Vasquez, Jens Möhring, Malthe Schmidt, Manfred Schönleben, Chris-Carolin Schön, Hans-Peter Piepho

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Winter-Type Allele ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality: an example in sorghum.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela-Maria Bernal-Vasquez
Jens Möhring
Malthe Schmidt
Manfred Schönleben
Chris-Carolin Schön
Hans-Peter PiephoBioinformatics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. piepho@uni-hohenheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic prediction is becoming a daily tool for plant breeders. It makes use of genotypic information to make predictions used for selection decisions. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the number of genotypes used in the calibration; hence, there is a need of combining data across years. A proper phenotypic analysis is a crucial prerequisite for accurate calibration of genomic prediction procedures. We compared stage-wise approaches to analyse a real dataset of a multi-environment trial (MET) in rye, which was connected between years only through one check, and used different spatial models to obtain better estimates, and thus, improved predictive abilities for genomic prediction. The aims of this study were to assess the advantage of using spatial models for the predictive abilities of genomic prediction, to identify suitable procedures to analyse a MET weakly connected across years using different stage-wise approaches, and to explore genomic prediction as a tool for selection of models for phenotypic data analysis.

resultsUsing complex spatial models did not significantly improve the predictive ability of genomic prediction, but using row and column effects yielded the highest predictive abilities of all models. In the case of MET poorly connected between years, analysing each year separately and fitting year as a fixed effect in the genomic prediction stage yielded the most realistic predictive abilities. Predictive abilities can also be used to select models for phenotypic data analysis. The trend of the predictive abilities was not the same as the traditionally used Akaike information criterion, but favoured in the end the same models.

conclusionsMaking predictions using weakly linked datasets is of utmost interest for plant breeders. We provide an example with suggestions on how to handle such cases. Rather than relying on checks we show how to use year means across all entries for integrating data across years. It is further shown that fitting of row and column effects captures most of the heterogeneity in the field trials analysed.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPhenotypeGenomicsReproducibility of ResultsSecaleStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25087599
PMCPMC4133075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.