ArticleBMC genomics2014
The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.The plant genome · 2026Article
- AI-integrated digital breeding for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Article
- Optimizing phenotypic data analysis strategies to enhance genomic prediction in winter wheat breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction using information across years with epistatic models and dimension reduction via haplotype blocks.PloS one · 2023Article
- Improving lodgepole pine genomic evaluation using spatial correlation structure and SNP selection with single-step GBLUP.Heredity · 2022Article
- Spatial Regression Models for Field Trials: A Comparative Study and New Ideas.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Integrating a growth degree-days based reaction norm methodology and multi-trait modeling for genomic prediction in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Spatial kernel models capturing field heterogeneity for accurate estimation of genetic potential.Breeding science · 2021Article
- Accounting for spatial trends in multi-environment diallel analysis in maize breeding.PloS one · 2021Article
- The Winter-Type Allele ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Sequencing depth and genotype quality: accuracy and breeding operation considerations for genomic selection applications in autopolyploid crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Genomics-assisted breeding in minor and pseudo-cereals.Breeding science · 2020Article
- Genomic prediction of yield and root development in wheat under changing water availability.Plant methods · 2020Article
- Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- A Study of Genomic Prediction of 12 Important Traits in the Domesticated Yak (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality: an example in sorghum.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- Genomic Selection in Preliminary Yield Trials in a Winter Wheat Breeding Program.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Historical Datasets Support Genomic Selection Models for the Prediction of Cotton Fiber Quality Phenotypes Across Multiple Environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain.Trends in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction is becoming a daily tool for plant breeders. It makes use of genotypic information to make predictions used for selection decisions. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the number of genotypes used in the calibration; hence, there is a need of combining data across years. A proper phenotypic analysis is a crucial prerequisite for accurate calibration of genomic prediction procedures. We compared stage-wise approaches to analyse a real dataset of a multi-environment trial (MET) in rye, which was connected between years only through one check, and used different spatial models to obtain better estimates, and thus, improved predictive abilities for genomic prediction. The aims of this study were to assess the advantage of using spatial models for the predictive abilities of genomic prediction, to identify suitable procedures to analyse a MET weakly connected across years using different stage-wise approaches, and to explore genomic prediction as a tool for selection of models for phenotypic data analysis.
resultsUsing complex spatial models did not significantly improve the predictive ability of genomic prediction, but using row and column effects yielded the highest predictive abilities of all models. In the case of MET poorly connected between years, analysing each year separately and fitting year as a fixed effect in the genomic prediction stage yielded the most realistic predictive abilities. Predictive abilities can also be used to select models for phenotypic data analysis. The trend of the predictive abilities was not the same as the traditionally used Akaike information criterion, but favoured in the end the same models.
conclusionsMaking predictions using weakly linked datasets is of utmost interest for plant breeders. We provide an example with suggestions on how to handle such cases. Rather than relying on checks we show how to use year means across all entries for integrating data across years. It is further shown that fitting of row and column effects captures most of the heterogeneity in the field trials analysed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.