Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25087088›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2015

MET abnormalities in patients with genitourinary malignancies and outcomes with c-MET inhibitors.

Denis L F Jardim, Débora de Melo Gagliato, Gerald Falchook, Ralph Zinner, Jennifer J Wheler, Filip Janku, Vivek Subbiah, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Siqing Fu, Nizar Tannir and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denis L F JardimDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: denis.ljardim@hsl.org.br.
Débora de Melo GagliatoDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gerald FalchookDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ralph ZinnerDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jennifer J WhelerDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Filip JankuDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Vivek SubbiahDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sarina A Piha-PaulDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Siqing FuDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nizar TannirDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Paul CornDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Chad TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Kenneth HessDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sinchita Roy-ChowdhuriDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Razelle KurzrockDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
David S HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MET amplification and mutation among GU malignancies and its association with clinical factors and responses to c-MET inhibitors. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with GU malignancies referred to our Phase I Clinical Trials Program were evaluated for MET mutation and amplification and outcomes using protocols with c-MET inhibitors.

resultsMET amplification was found in 7 of 97 (7.2%) patients (4/27 renal [all clear cell], 1/18 urothelial, and 2/12 adrenocortical carcinoma), with MET mutation/variant in 3 of 54 (5.6%) (2/20 renal cell carcinoma [RCC] [1 clear cell and 1 papillary] and 1/16 prostate cancer). No demographic characteristics were associated with specific MET abnormalities, but patients who tested positive for mutation or amplification had more metastatic sites (median, 4 vs. 3 for wild type MET). Median overall survival after phase I consultation was 6.1 and 11.5 months for patients with and without a MET alteration, respectively (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 6.9; P = .034). Twenty-nine (25%) patients were treated according to a c-MET inhibitor protocol. Six (21%) had a partial response (prostate and RCC) and 10 (34%) had stable disease as best response. Median time to tumor progression was 2.3 months (range, 0.4-19.7) for all treated patients with no responses in patients with a MET abnormality or single-agent c-MET inhibitor treatment.

conclusionMET genetic abnormalities occur in diverse GU malignancies and are associated with a worse prognosis in a phase I setting. Efficacy of c-MET inhibitors was more pronounced in patients without MET abnormalities and when combined with other targets/drugs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicFemaleGene AmplificationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsMET protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metBladder cancerMET amplificationMET mutationProstate cancerRenal cell cancer

Identifiers

PMID25087088
PMCPMC5144738
OpenAlexW2065407464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.