Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25087085›Full record

Trial reportInternal and emergency medicine2015

Short and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent loop diuretics treatment in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction.

Alberto Palazzuoli, Marco Pellegrini, Beatrice Franci, Matteo Beltrami, Gaetano Ruocco, Stefano Gonnelli, Gianni D Angelini, Ranuccio Nuti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01441245 (Continuous Versus Intermittent Loop Diuretics Infusion Dosing in Acute Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01441245 phase4completednot on this map

Continuous Versus Intermittent Loop Diuretics Infusion Dosing in Acute Heart Failure: Effects on Renal Function, Outcome and BNP Levels

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SienaRan2010 to 2017Enrolled57ConditionsAcute Heart FailureArmsfurosemide infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto PalazzuoliDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, Internal Medicine, S Maria Alle Scotte Hospital University of Siena, Siena, Italy, palazzuoli2@unisi.it.
Marco Pellegrini
Beatrice Franci
Matteo Beltrami
Gaetano Ruocco
Stefano Gonnelli
Gianni D Angelini
Ranuccio Nuti
University of Siena · ITOspedale Santa Maria alle Scotte · ITNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous loop diuretics are still the cornerstone of therapy in acute decompensated heart failure, however, the optimal dosage and administration strategies remain poorly defined particularly in patients with an associated renal dysfunction. This is a single-center, pilot, randomized trial involving patients with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Patients were assigned to receive continuous furosemide infusion (cIV) or bolus injections of furosemide (iIV). Primary end points were the evaluation of urine output volumes, renal function, and b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels during treatment time. Secondary end point included: weight loss, length of hospitalization, differences in plasma electrolytes, need for additional treatment, and evaluation of cardiac events during follow-up period. 57 patients were included in the study. The cIV group showed an increase in urine output (2,505 ± 796 vs 2140 ± 468 ml/day, p < 0.04) and a more significant decrease of BNP levels in respect to the iIV group (679.6 ± 397 vs 949 ± 548 pg/ml, p < 0.04). We observed a significant increase in creatinine levels (1.78 ± 0.5 vs 1.41 ± 0.3 mg/dl, p < 0.01), and a reduction of the estimated glomerular filtration rate in cIV (44.8 ± 6.1 vs 46.7 ± 6.1 ml/min, p < 0.05). We observed a significant difference in eGFR (p = 0.01), creatinine (p = 0.02) and BNP levels (p = 0.03) from baseline to the end of treatment in both groups. A significant increase of in-hospital additional treatment as well as length of hospitalization was observed in cIV. Finally, cIV revealed a higher rate of adverse events during the follow-up period (p < 0.03). cIV appears to provide a more efficient diuresis and BNP level reduction during hospitalization, however, it was associated with increased rate of worsening renal function during hospitalization. cIV also appears related to a longer hospitalization and an increased number of adverse events during follow-up. For all of these reasons, a larger multi-center study is required to determine whether high-dose diuretics are responsible for worsening renal function and to define the best modality of administration.

Indexed as

Time FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcute DiseaseAdministration, IntravenousAgedDiureticsFemaleFurosemideHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal InsufficiencyDiureticsFurosemide

Identifiers

PMID25087085
OpenAlexW1987952517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.