Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25086608›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2014

An olfactory cocktail party: figure-ground segregation of odorants in rodents.

Dan Rokni, Vivian Hemmelder, Vikrant Kapoor, Venkatesh N Murthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Simultaneous detection and estimation in olfactory sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adaptive algorithms for shaping behavior.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dan Rokni1] Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular &Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Vivian Hemmelder1] Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular &Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Vikrant Kapoor1] Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular &Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Venkatesh N Murthy1] Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular &Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Optogenetic studies of mouse olfactionR01DC011291 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, VENKATESH N · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In odorant-rich environments, animals must be able to detect specific odorants of interest against variable backgrounds. However, studies have found that both humans and rodents are poor at analyzing the components of odorant mixtures, suggesting that olfaction is a synthetic sense in which mixtures are perceived holistically. We found that mice could be easily trained to detect target odorants embedded in unpredictable and variable mixtures. To relate the behavioral performance to neural representation, we imaged the responses of olfactory bulb glomeruli to individual odors in mice expressing the Ca(2+) indicator GCaMP3 in olfactory receptor neurons. The difficulty of segregating the target from the background depended strongly on the extent of overlap between the glomerular responses to target and background odors. Our study indicates that the olfactory system has powerful analytic abilities that are constrained by the limits of combinatorial neural representation of odorants at the level of the olfactory receptors.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrain MappingConditioning, PsychologicalMaleMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalOlfactory BulbOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPerceptual MaskingReceptors, OdorantSensory ThresholdsSmellReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID25086608
PMCPMC4146660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.