Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25086533›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2014

Task-based detectability in CT image reconstruction by filtered backprojection and penalized likelihood estimation.

Grace J Gang, J Webster Stayman, Wojciech Zbijewski, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning CT image restoration using system blur and noise models.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. End-to-end Deep Learning Restoration of GLCM Features from blurred and noisy images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  9. Fourier Diffusion for Sparse CT Reconstruction.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Learning CT Image Restoration using System Blur Models.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. End-to-end Modeling for Predicting and Estimating Radiomics: Application to Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrices in CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace J GangInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland 21205.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland 21205.
Wojciech ZbijewskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland 21205.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Funding

Image Science for the New X-ray: Taking NEQ to TaskR01CA112163 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2006 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS 2R01-CA-112163NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNonstationarity is an important aspect of imaging performance in CT and cone-beam CT (CBCT), especially for systems employing iterative reconstruction. This work presents a theoretical framework for both filtered-backprojection (FBP) and penalized-likelihood (PL) reconstruction that includes explicit descriptions of nonstationary noise, spatial resolution, and task-based detectability index. Potential utility of the model was demonstrated in the optimal selection of regularization parameters in PL reconstruction.

methodsAnalytical models for local modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) were investigated for both FBP and PL reconstruction, including explicit dependence on the object and spatial location. For FBP, a cascaded systems analysis framework was adapted to account for nonstationarity by separately calculating fluence and system gains for each ray passing through any given voxel. For PL, the point-spread function and covariance were derived using the implicit function theorem and first-order Taylor expansion according to Fessler ["Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5(3), 493-506 (1996)]. Detectability index was calculated for a variety of simple tasks. The model for PL was used in selecting the regularization strength parameter to optimize task-based performance, with both a constant and a spatially varying regularization map.

resultsTheoretical models of FBP and PL were validated in 2D simulated fan-beam data and found to yield accurate predictions of local MTF and NPS as a function of the object and the spatial location. The NPS for both FBP and PL exhibit similar anisotropic nature depending on the pathlength (and therefore, the object and spatial location within the object) traversed by each ray, with the PL NPS experiencing greater smoothing along directions with higher noise. The MTF of FBP is isotropic and independent of location to a first order approximation, whereas the MTF of PL is anisotropic in a manner complementary to the NPS. Task-based detectability demonstrates dependence on the task, object, spatial location, and smoothing parameters. A spatially varying regularization "map" designed from locally optimal regularization can improve overall detectability beyond that achievable with the commonly used constant regularization parameter.

conclusionsAnalytical models for task-based FBP and PL reconstruction are predictive of nonstationary noise and resolution characteristics, providing a valuable framework for understanding and optimizing system performance in CT and CBCT.

Indexed as

AnisotropyArtifactsComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, BiologicalMotionPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25086533
PMCPMC4115652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.