Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25086123›Full record

Trial reportThe bone & joint journal2014

CT scan-evaluated outcome of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

P F W Hannemann, M R van Wezenbeek, K A Kolkman, E L L Twiss, C H J Berghmans, P A M G M Dirven, P R G Brink, M Poeze

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The bone & joint journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone fractures: a systematic review update.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Signalling pathways underlying pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. [Advances in diagnosis and treatment of acute scaphoid fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

P F W HannemannMaastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M R van WezenbeekMaastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
K A KolkmanRijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Department of Surgery, PO Box 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, the Netherlands.
E L L TwissCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Surgery, PO Box 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
C H J BerghmansIsala Clinics, Department of Surgery, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, the Netherlands.
P A M G M DirvenMaasziekenhuis Pantein Hospital, Department of Surgery, PO Box 55, 5830 AB Boxmeer, the Netherlands.
P R G BrinkMaastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M PoezeMaastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLIsala · NLMaaslandziekenhuis · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesised that the use of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) bone growth stimulation in acute scaphoid fractures would significantly shorten the time to union and reduce the number of nonunions in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. A total of 102 patients (78 male, 24 female; mean age 35 years (18 to 77)) from five different medical centres with a unilateral undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly allocated to PEMF (n = 51) or placebo (n = 51) and assessed with regard to functional and radiological outcomes (multiplanar reconstructed CT scans) at 6, 9, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The overall time to clinical and radiological healing did not differ significantly between the active PEMF group and the placebo group. We concluded that the addition of PEMF bone growth stimulation to the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures does not accelerate bone healing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFracture HealingFractures, BoneHumansMagnetic Field TherapyMaleMiddle AgedScaphoid BoneTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConsolidationFunctional outcomePEMFRadiological outcomeScaphoid fracture

Identifiers

PMID25086123
OpenAlexW2155695555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.