Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25085990›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2014

Modelling of a targeted nanotherapeutic 'stroma' to deliver the cytokine LIF, or XAV939, a potent inhibitor of Wnt-β-catenin signalling, for use in human fetal dopaminergic grafts in Parkinson's disease.

Jing-Wei Zhao, Sean C Dyson, Christina Kriegel, Pam Tyers, Xiaoling He, Tarek M Fahmy, Su M Metcalfe, Roger A Barker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Wnt/β-catenin pathway involvement in ionizing radiation-induced invasion of U87 glioblastoma cells.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing-Wei ZhaoJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK.
Sean C DysonJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK.
Christina KriegelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, Malone Engineering Center, 55 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Pam TyersJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK.
Xiaoling HeJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK.
Tarek M FahmyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, Malone Engineering Center, 55 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Su M MetcalfeJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK. smm1001@cam.ac.uk.
Roger A BarkerJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UK.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBYale University · US

Funding

Department of Health II-AR-1109-11037Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endogenous reparative capacity of the adult human brain is low, and chronic neurodegenerative disorders of the central nervous system represent one of the greatest areas of unmet clinical need in the developing world. Novel therapeutic strategies to treat them include: (i) growth factor delivery to boost endogenous repair and (ii) replacement cell therapy, including replacing dopaminergic neurons to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). However, these approaches are restricted not only by rapid degradation of growth factors, but also by the limited availability of cells for transplant and the poor survival of implanted cells that lack the necessary stromal support. We therefore hypothesised that provision of a transient artificial stroma for paracrine delivery of pro-survival factors could overcome both of these issues. Using leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) - a proneural, reparative cytokine - formulated as target-specific poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nano-particles (LIF-nano-stroma), we discovered that attachment of LIF-nano-stroma to freshly isolated fetal dopaminergic cells improved their survival fourfold: furthermore, in vivo, the number of surviving human fetal dopaminergic cells tended to be higher at 3 months after grafting into the striatum of nude rats, compared with controls treated with empty nanoparticles. In addition, we also analysed the effect of a novel nano-stroma incorporating XAV939 (XAV), a potent inhibitor of the developmentally important Wnt-β-catenin signalling pathway, to investigate whether it could also promote the survival and differentiation of human fetal dopaminergic precursors; we found that the numbers of both tyrosine-hydroxylase-positive neurons (a marker of dopaminergic neurons) and total neurons were increased. This is the first demonstration that LIF-nano-stroma and XAV-nano-stroma each have pro-survival effects on human dopaminergic neurons, with potential value for target-specific modulation of neurogenic fate in cell-based therapies for PD.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersNanoparticlesSignal Transductionbeta CateninDopamineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansLeukemia Inhibitory FactorMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningParkinson DiseaseWnt Proteinsbeta CateninDopamineDrug CarriersHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLeukemia Inhibitory FactorWnt ProteinsXAV939LIFNanotherapyParkinson’s diseaseXAV939

Identifiers

PMID25085990
PMCPMC4174530
OpenAlexW2104836161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.