Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25085912›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

Endocytosis of viruses and bacteria.

Pascale Cossart, Ari Helenius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogen-induced rerouting of host membrane trafficking.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Innate Immune Response to Viral Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pascale CossartInstitut Pasteur, Unité des Interactions Bactéries-Cellules, Paris F-75015, France; INSERM U604, Paris F-75015, France; and INRA, USC2020, Paris F-75015, France.
Ari HeleniusInstitute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Of the many pathogens that infect humans and animals, a large number use cells of the host organism as protected sites for replication. To reach the relevant intracellular compartments, they take advantage of the endocytosis machinery and exploit the network of endocytic organelles for penetration into the cytosol or as sites of replication. In this review, we discuss the endocytic entry processes used by viruses and bacteria and compare the strategies used by these dissimilar classes of pathogens.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalVirus InternalizationBacterial AdhesionEndocytosisEukaryotic CellsMetabolic Networks and Pathways

Identifiers

PMID25085912
PMCPMC4107984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.