ArticleThe Journal of physiology2014
Presynaptic actions of transcranial and local direct current stimulation in the red nucleus.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term modulation of the axonal refractory period.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Effects of tACS-Like Electrical Stimulation on Off- and On-Off Center Retinal Ganglion Cells: Part II.Eye and brain · 2022Article
- Activation response and functional connectivity change in rat cortex after bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation-An exploratory study.Journal of neuroscience research · 2021Article
- Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Applied to the Left Premotor Cortex Interferes with Explicit Reproduction of a Motor Sequence.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Effects of tACS-Like Electrical Stimulation on On-Center Retinal Ganglion Cells: Part I.Eye and brain · 2021Article
- Is there hope that transpinal direct current stimulation corrects motoneuron excitability and provides neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?Physiological reports · 2021Review
- Modulation of solute diffusivity in brain tissue as a novel mechanism of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Branching points of primary afferent fibers are vital for the modulation of fiber excitability by epidural DC polarization and by GABA in the rat spinal cord.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Exploring new transcranial electrical stimulation strategies to modulate brain function in animal models.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Using animal models to improve the design and application of transcranial electrical stimulation in humans.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2018Article
- Effects of tDCS-like electrical stimulation on retinal ganglion cells.Eye and brain · 2018Article
- Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.The Journal of physiology · 2015Article
- Direct Current Stimulation Alters Neuronal Input/Output Function.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The main aim of the present study was to examine to what extent long-lasting subcortical actions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be related to its presynaptic actions. This was investigated in the red nucleus, where tDCS was recently demonstrated to facilitate transmission between interpositorubral and rubrospinal neurons. Changes in the excitability of preterminal axonal branches of interpositorubral neurons close to rubrospinal neurons were investigated during and after tDCS (0.2 mA) applied over the sensorimotor cortical area in deeply anaesthetized rats and cats. As a measure of the excitability, we used the probability of antidromic activation of individual interpositorubral neurons by electrical stimuli applied in the red nucleus. Our second aim was to compare effects of weak (≤1 μA) direct current applied within the red nucleus with effects of tDCS to allow the use of local depolarization in a further analysis of mechanisms of tDCS instead of widespread and more difficult to control depolarization evoked by distant electrodes. Local cathodal polarization was found to replicate all effects of cathodal tDCS hitherto demonstrated in the rat, including long-lasting facilitation of trans-synaptically evoked descending volleys and trisynaptically evoked EMG responses in neck muscles. It also replicated all effects of anodal tDCS in the cat. In both species, it increased the excitability of preterminal axonal branches of interpositorubral neurons up to 1 h post-tDCS. Local anodal polarization evoked opposite effects. We thus show that presynaptic actions of polarizing direct current may contribute to both immediate and prolonged effects of tDCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.