Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25085447›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2014

Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for under-served people in primary care.

Karina Lovell, Jonathan Lamb, Linda Gask, Pete Bower, Waquas Waheed, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Jon Lamb, Saadia Aseem, Susan Beatty, Heather Burroughs and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Coproducing COVID-19 Health Information Resources: A Participatory Study With Older Adults From Minoritised Ethnic Communities in the UK.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. How do people with long-term mental health problems negotiate relationships with network members at times of crisis?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karina LovellSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University Place, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Karina.Lovell@manchester.ac.uk.
Jonathan Lamb
Linda Gask
Pete Bower
Waquas Waheed
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Jon Lamb
Saadia Aseem
Susan Beatty
Heather Burroughs
Pam Clarke
Anna Dowrick
Suzanne Edwards
Mark Gabbay
Mari Lloyd-Williams
Chris Dowrick
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1071Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council G0401181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological therapy is effective for symptoms of mental distress, but many groups with high levels of mental distress face significant barriers in terms of access to care, as current interventions may not be sensitive to their needs or their understanding of mental health. There is a need to develop forms of psychological therapy that are acceptable to these groups, feasible to deliver in routine settings, and clinically and cost effective.

methodsWe developed a culturally sensitive wellbeing intervention with individual, group and sign-posting elements, and tested its feasibility and acceptability for patients from ethnic minorities and older people in an exploratory randomised trial.

resultsWe recruited 57 patients (57% of our target) from 4 disadvantaged localities in the NW of England. The results of the exploratory trial suggest that the group receiving the wellbeing interventions improved compared to the group receiving usual care. For elders, the largest effects were on CORE-OM and PHQ-9. For ethnic minority patients, the largest effect was on PHQ-9. Qualitative data suggested that patients found the intervention acceptable, both in terms of content and delivery.

conclusionsThis exploratory trial provides some evidence of the efficacy and acceptability of a wellbeing intervention for older and ethnic minority groups experiencing anxiety and depression, although challenges in recruitment and engagement remain. Evidence from our exploratory study of wellbeing interventions should inform new substantive trial designs.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN68572159.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonPrimary Health CareVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25085447
PMCPMC4149271
OpenAlexW2110062283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.