Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25084660›Full record

ArticleFood microbiology2014

The effects of competition from non-pathogenic foodborne bacteria during the selective enrichment of Listeria monocytogenes using buffered Listeria enrichment broth.

Rachel C Dailey, Keely G Martin, R Derike Smiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Multiplex RT-PCR Assay forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel C DaileyArkansas Regional Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Building 26, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
Keely G MartinArkansas Regional Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Building 26, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
R Derike SmileyArkansas Regional Laboratory, Office of Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Building 26, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA. Electronic address: Ronald.Smiley@fda.hhs.gov.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of Listeria monocytogenes during the pathogen specific enrichment of food samples can be limited by the presence of additional microorganisms that are resistant to the selective conditions being applied. If growth is severely limited and minimum post-enrichment threshold levels are not met then the presence of L. monocytogenes may go undetected. Several food products were screened for non-pathogenic commensal or spoilage microorganisms that are capable of growth under the conditions commonly used by regulatory testing laboratories to select for Listeria species. The effect of these potential competitor microorganisms on the ability to detect L. monocytogenes by several common molecular screening assays was then determined. Eight species of bacteria were isolated from foods that demonstrated the ability to grow in buffered Listeria enrichment broth under selective conditions. Growth of these competitor microorganisms during the enrichment incubation resulted in a decrease ranging from 1 to 4 logs in the 48 h population of L. monocytogenes. Three strains of L. monocytogenes representing serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b were included in this study but no one serotype appeared to be most or least sensitive to the presence of competitor microorganisms. One additional strain of L. monocytogenes was identified as displaying minimal growth during the enrichment period in the presence of the Citrobacter braakii with the final population only reaching approximately 2.6 log CFU/ml after 48 h which was a 2 log increase over the initial population. This particular strain was subsequently shown to be difficult to detect following enrichment by an automated immunofluorescence assay and an antibody-based lateral flow device assay. In some enrichments, this strain was also difficult to detect by real-time PCR.

Indexed as

BacteriaCulture MediaFood ContaminationListeria monocytogenesCulture MediaAnalytical microbiologyAutomated immunofluorescence assayFoodborne pathogenLateral flow deviceMicrobial competitionMolecular screenPCRReal-time PCRRegulatory microbiology

Identifiers

PMID25084660
PMCPMC5102390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.