Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25084625›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2014

The Academy for Future Science Faculty: randomized controlled trial of theory-driven coaching to shape development and diversity of early-career scientists.

Bhoomi K Thakore, Michelle E Naffziger-Hirsch, Jennifer L Richardson, Simon N Williams, Richard McGee

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Coaching to Augment Mentoring to Achieve Faculty Diversity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bhoomi K Thakore
Michelle E Naffziger-Hirsch
Jennifer L Richardson
Simon N Williams
Richard McGeeNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E, Superior Ave,, Rubloff 647, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. r-mcgee@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · USOakton Community College · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Career Decision-Making of Future Minority Biomedical Science FacultyR01GM085385 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2008 to 2015
$3.0M
Translating Theory to Practice to Diversify the Biomedical Research CommunityDP4GM096807 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2010 to 2010
$2.0M
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science FacultyR01NR011987 · NINR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
The Academy for Future Science Faculty_Diversity Through Theory Driven CoachingR01GM107701 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP4 GM096807NIGMS NIH HHS DP4 GM096807NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085385NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085385-02S1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107701NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproaches to training biomedical scientists have created a talented research community. However, they have failed to create a professional workforce that includes many racial and ethnic minorities and women in proportion to their representation in the population or in PhD training. This is particularly true at the faculty level. Explanations for the absence of diversity in faculty ranks can be found in social science theories that reveal processes by which individuals develop identities, experiences, and skills required to be seen as legitimate within the profession. METHODS/

designUsing the social science theories of Communities of Practice, Social Cognitive Career Theory, identity formation, and cultural capital, we have developed and are testing a novel coaching-based model to address some of the limitations of previous diversity approaches. This coaching intervention (The Academy for Future Science Faculty) includes annual in-person meetings of students and trained faculty Career Coaches, along with ongoing virtual coaching, group meetings and communication. The model is being tested as a randomized controlled trial with two cohorts of biomedical PhD students from across the U.S., one recruited at the start of their PhDs and one nearing completion. Stratification into the experimental and control groups, and to coaching groups within the experimental arms, achieved equal numbers of students by race, ethnicity and gender to the extent possible. A fundamental design element of the Academy is to teach and make visible the social science principles which highly influence scientific advancement, as well as acknowledging the extra challenges faced by underrepresented groups working to be seen as legitimate within the scientific communities. DISCUSSION: The strategy being tested is based upon a novel application of the well-established principles of deploying highly skilled coaches, selected and trained for their ability to develop talents of others. This coaching model is intended to be a complement, rather than a substitute, for traditional mentoring in biomedical research training, and is being tested as such.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityResearch PersonnelBiomedical ResearchFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsModels, TheoreticalUnited StatesVocational GuidanceWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID25084625
PMCPMC4121509
OpenAlexW1981369733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.