Trial reportBMC medical education2014
The Academy for Future Science Faculty: randomized controlled trial of theory-driven coaching to shape development and diversity of early-career scientists.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mentoring as an intervention to promote gender equality in academic medicine: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Coaching to Augment Mentoring to Achieve Faculty Diversity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2016Trial
- Qualitative evaluation of a coaching and leadership program for early-stage researchers in KL2 and T32 training programs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Support systems impacting the mental health of diverse women in biomedical science programs: An ecological approach.SSM. Mental health · 2025Article
- Addressing structural mentoring barriers in postdoctoral training: a qualitative study.Studies in graduate and postdoctoral education · 2025Article
- Exploring grant writing coaching and its role in professional development of health equity investigators: A qualitative study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Career coach preferences of medical students: coaching specialist or specialistic coach?BMC medical education · 2023Article
- "In the back of my mind": A Longitudinal Multiple Case Study Analysis of Successful Black Women Biomedical Graduate Students Navigating Gendered Racism.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- A scientific communication mentoring intervention benefits diverse mentees with language variety related discomfort.Psychology of language and communication · 2023Article
- Career Development Program for Underrepresented in Medicine Scholars in Academic Neurology: TRANSCENDS.Neurology · 2021Article
- MyNRMN: A national mentoring and networking platform to enhance connectivity and diversity in the biomedical sciences.FASEB bioAdvances · 2021Article
- Comprehensive analysis of 2.4 million patent-to-research citations maps the biomedical innovation and translation landscape.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- Introducing the Stroke Editor Training Program for Underrepresented in Medicine Scholars.Stroke · 2021Article
- Representation of Racial/ Ethnic Minority Individuals in the Leadership of Major Medical Journals.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2021Article
- The Association Between NRMN STAR Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy and Grant Submission.Ethnicity & disease · 2021Article
- The ASPET Mentoring Network: Enhancing Diversity and Inclusion through Career Coaching Groups within a Scientific Society.CBE life sciences education · 2020Article
- The Academic Career Readiness Assessment: Clarifying Hiring and Training Expectations for Future Biomedical Life Sciences Faculty.CBE life sciences education · 2020Article
- A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Review
- Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce.Ethnicity & disease · 2019Article
- Competing Discourses of Scientific Identity among Postdoctoral Scholars in the Biomedical Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproaches to training biomedical scientists have created a talented research community. However, they have failed to create a professional workforce that includes many racial and ethnic minorities and women in proportion to their representation in the population or in PhD training. This is particularly true at the faculty level. Explanations for the absence of diversity in faculty ranks can be found in social science theories that reveal processes by which individuals develop identities, experiences, and skills required to be seen as legitimate within the profession. METHODS/
designUsing the social science theories of Communities of Practice, Social Cognitive Career Theory, identity formation, and cultural capital, we have developed and are testing a novel coaching-based model to address some of the limitations of previous diversity approaches. This coaching intervention (The Academy for Future Science Faculty) includes annual in-person meetings of students and trained faculty Career Coaches, along with ongoing virtual coaching, group meetings and communication. The model is being tested as a randomized controlled trial with two cohorts of biomedical PhD students from across the U.S., one recruited at the start of their PhDs and one nearing completion. Stratification into the experimental and control groups, and to coaching groups within the experimental arms, achieved equal numbers of students by race, ethnicity and gender to the extent possible. A fundamental design element of the Academy is to teach and make visible the social science principles which highly influence scientific advancement, as well as acknowledging the extra challenges faced by underrepresented groups working to be seen as legitimate within the scientific communities. DISCUSSION: The strategy being tested is based upon a novel application of the well-established principles of deploying highly skilled coaches, selected and trained for their ability to develop talents of others. This coaching model is intended to be a complement, rather than a substitute, for traditional mentoring in biomedical research training, and is being tested as such.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.