ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2015
Three-dimensional printing of nanomaterial scaffolds for complex tissue regeneration.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing-Based Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Implantable 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Spinal Cord Injury.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Review
- From Nature to Technology: Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based Materials and Modified Plants in Biomimetics, Bionics, and Green Innovations.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mechanical Characteristics of Individualized Biodegradable Augmentation Scaffold-In Vitro Pilot Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Flow Sensing Device Formed Exclusively by Employing Additive Manufacturing for On-Site Fabrication Aboard a Ship.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recent advances in 3D printable conductive hydrogel inks for neural engineering.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Review
- Concentric-mineralized hybrid silk-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineeringJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Collagen for neural tissue engineering: Materials, strategies, and challenges.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Applications of functionally-adapted hydrogels in tendon repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Development and Application of Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Scaffold in the Repair of Spinal Cord Injury.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Review
- 3D Printed Hydrogels for Ocular Wound Healing.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Biopolymer Fabrication in Additive Manufacturing Processing for 3D-Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds.Polymers · 2022Review
- 3D Printed Personalized Nerve Guide Conduits for Precision Repair of Peripheral Nerve Defects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing of a Hybrid Bioceramic and Biopolymer Porous Scaffold for Promoting Bone Regeneration Potential.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Three dimensional printed nanostructure biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Advanced bioactive nanomaterials for biomedical applications.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2021Review
- Article
- Nanoemulsions: Formulation, characterization, biological fate, and potential role against COVID-19 and other viral outbreaks.Colloid and interface science communications · 2021Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has recently expanded in popularity, and become the cutting edge of tissue engineering research. A growing emphasis from clinicians on patient-specific care, coupled with an increasing knowledge of cellular and biomaterial interaction, has led researchers to explore new methods that enable the greatest possible control over the arrangement of cells and bioactive nanomaterials in defined scaffold geometries. In this light, the cutting edge technology of 3D printing also enables researchers to more effectively compose multi-material and cell-laden scaffolds with less effort. In this review, we explore the current state of 3D printing with a focus on printing of nanomaterials and their effect on various complex tissue regeneration applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.