ArticleChronobiology international2014
Neither the SCN nor the adrenals are required for circadian time-place learning in mice.
Article in Chronobiology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian Rhythms and Lung Cancer in the Context of Aging: A Review of Current Evidence.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Dietary fasting and time-restricted eating in Huntington's disease: therapeutic potential and underlying mechanisms.Translational neurodegeneration · 2024Review
- Circadian neurogenetics and its implications in neurophysiology, behavior, and chronomedicine.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- The clock gene Per1 is necessary in the retrosplenial cortex-but not in the suprachiasmatic nucleus-for incidental learning in young and aging male mice.Neurobiology of aging · 2023Article
- Circadian clocks, cognition, and Alzheimer's disease: synaptic mechanisms, signaling effectors, and chronotherapeutics.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2022Review
- Suppression of Circadian Timing and Its Impact on the Hippocampus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Effects of aging on circadian patterns of gene expression in the human prefrontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Voluntary Exercise Prevents Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Phenylketonuria Mice.JIMD reports · 2016Article
- Time-place learning over a lifetime: absence of memory loss in trained old mice.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2015Article
- Role of Aging and Hippocampus in Time-Place Learning: Link to Episodic-Like Memory?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Article
- Meal frequency and timing in health and disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During Time-Place Learning (TPL), animals link biological significant events (e.g. encountering predators, food, mates) with the location and time of occurrence in the environment. This allows animals to anticipate which locations to visit or avoid based on previous experience and knowledge of the current time of day. The TPL task applied in this study consists of three daily sessions in a three-arm maze, with a food reward at the end of each arm. During each session, mice should avoid one specific arm to avoid a foot-shock. We previously demonstrated that, rather than using external cue-based strategies, mice use an internal clock (circadian strategy) for TPL, referred to as circadian TPL (cTPL). It is unknown in which brain region(s) or peripheral organ(s) the consulted clock underlying cTPL resides. Three candidates were examined in this study: (a) the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a light entrainable oscillator (LEO) and considered the master circadian clock in the brain, (b) the food entrainable oscillator (FEO), entrained by restricted food availability, and (c) the adrenal glands, harboring an important peripheral oscillator. cTPL performance should be affected if the underlying oscillator system is abruptly phase-shifted. Therefore, we first investigated cTPL sensitivity to abrupt light and food shifts. Next we investigated cTPL in SCN-lesioned- and adrenalectomized mice. Abrupt FEO phase-shifts (induced by advancing and delaying feeding time) affected TPL performance in specific test sessions while a LEO phase-shift (induced by a light pulse) more severely affected TPL performance in all three daily test sessions. SCN-lesioned mice showed no TPL deficiencies compared to SHAM-lesioned mice. Moreover, both SHAM- and SCN-lesioned mice showed unaffected cTPL performance when re-tested after bilateral adrenalectomy. We conclude that, although cTPL is sensitive to timing manipulations with light as well as food, neither the SCN nor the adrenals are required for cTPL in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.