Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25083930›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

The ambrosia symbiosis is specific in some species and promiscuous in others: evidence from community pyrosequencing.

Martin Kostovcik, Craig C Bateman, Miroslav Kolarik, Lukasz L Stelinski, Bjarte H Jordal, Jiri Hulcr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How host species and body part determine the microbial communities of five ambrosia beetle species.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Flexibility in the ambrosia symbiosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin Kostovcik1] School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA [2] Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Praha 2, Czech Republic [3] Institute of Microbiology AS CR, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Craig C BatemanDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Miroslav Kolarik1] Institute of Microbiology AS CR, Praha 4, Czech Republic [2] Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Lukasz L StelinskiDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, USA.
Bjarte H JordalNatural History Museum, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jiri Hulcr1] School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA [2] Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbioses are increasingly seen as dynamic ecosystems with multiple associates and varying fidelity. Symbiont specificity remains elusive in one of the most ecologically successful and economically damaging eukaryotic symbioses: the ambrosia symbiosis of wood-boring beetles and fungi. We used multiplexed pyrosequencing of amplified internal transcribed spacer II (ITS2) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) libraries to document the communities of fungal associates and symbionts inside the mycangia (fungus transfer organ) of three ambrosia beetle species, Xyleborus affinis, Xyleborus ferrugineus and Xylosandrus crassiusculus. We processed 93 beetle samples from 5 locations across Florida, including reference communities. Fungal communities within mycangia included 14-20 fungus species, many more than reported by culture-based studies. We recovered previously known nutritional symbionts as members of the core community. We also detected several other fungal taxa that are equally frequent but whose function is unknown and many other transient species. The composition of fungal assemblages was significantly correlated with beetle species but not with locality. The type of mycangium appears to determine specificity: two Xyleborus with mandibular mycangia had multiple dominant associates with even abundances; Xylosandrus crassiusculus (mesonotal mycangium) communities were dominated by a single symbiont, Ambrosiella sp. Beetle mycangia also carried many fungi from the environment, including plant pathogens and endophytes. The ITS2 marker proved useful for ecological analyses, but the taxonomic resolution was limited to fungal genus or family, particularly in Ophiostomatales, which are under-represented in our amplicons as well as in public databases. This initial analysis of three beetle species suggests that each clade of ambrosia beetles and each mycangium type may support a functionally and taxonomically distinct symbiosis.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsBiodiversityColeopteraDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFloridaFungiGenetic MarkersPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal SpacerGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25083930
PMCPMC4274425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.