Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25083860›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Does drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization improve the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? A meta-analysis.

Shilong Han, Xiaoping Zhang, Liling Zou, Chenhui Lu, Jun Zhang, Jue Li, Maoquan Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shilong HanDepartment of Interventional & Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoping ZhangDepartment of Interventional & Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liling ZouHeart, Lung and Blood Vessel Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chenhui LuDepartment of Interventional & Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jun ZhangHeart, Lung and Blood Vessel Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jue LiHeart, Lung and Blood Vessel Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Maoquan LiDepartment of Interventional & Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tongji University · CNShanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug eluting beads (DEB) are relatively new embolic agents that allow sustained release of chemotherapeutic agents in a localized fashion to the tumor. This technique is associated with reduced systemic side effects relative to systemic chemotherapy and an increase in the dose of antineoplastic agent delivered to the lesion. The meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of DEB-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the management of hepatocellular cancer.

methodsWe searched the Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, EMBASE, the Wiley Library and Google Scholar for studies on DEB-TACE in the management of hepatocellular cancer from 1979 to April 2013. The risk of bias was assessed using RevMan 5 · 1. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. Disease control, complications and severe complications were recorded.

resultsFive studies met the selection criteria, three RCTs and two case-control studies, published from 2010 to 2012, included 217 patients in the DEB-TACE group and 237 in the conventional-TACE group. There was no significance over disease control (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.78-6.63) with moderate between-study heterogeneity (χ(2) = 6.83, degrees of freedom [df] = 3; p<0.08; I(2) = 56%). Complications in both groups were assessed and no significant difference was observed (χ(2) = 6.34, degrees of freedom [df]  = 4; p<0.18; I(2)= 37%). Severe complications were also assessed and no significant difference was observed (χ(2) = 6.47, degrees of freedom [df]  = 4; p<0.17; I(2)= 38%). No publication bias relating to the above outcomes was detected by funnel plot. DEB-TACE benefited disease control without an increase in complications and severe complications.

Indexed as

Chemoembolization, TherapeuticCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ManagementHumansLiver NeoplasmsOdds RatioPublication BiasTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25083860
PMCPMC4118844
OpenAlexW2072049447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.