ArticleIMA fungus2014
Recommendations on generic names competing for use in Leotiomycetes (Ascomycota).
Article in IMA fungus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phylogeny ofPersoonia · 2026Article
- Advancing the taxonomy ofIMA fungus · 2026Review
- An updated multigene phylogeny ofPersoonia · 2025Article
- Genera of phytopathogenic fungi known from culture: 1-379.Studies in mycology · 2025Article
- A taxonomic re-evaluation ofMycoscience · 2025Article
- Additions of New Endolichenic Fungi to Herpotrichiellaceae (Chaetothyriales, Ascomycota) from northern Thailand.MycoKeys · 2025Article
- Fungal Planet description sheets: 1614-1696.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024Article
- Recommendations on approving the name "MycoKeys · 2024Article
- Bioactive Compounds from an EndophyticBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Richer than Gold: the fungal biodiversity of Reserva Los Cedros, a threatened Andean cloud forest.Botanical studies · 2023Article
- Phenotypic Characterization and Phylogeny ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- From Genes to Molecules, Secondary Metabolism inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Additions to the Knowledge of the GenusBiology · 2022Article
- A review ofStudies in mycology · 2022Article
- Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4.Studies in mycology · 2022Article
- Current Insight into Traditional and Modern Methods in Fungal Diversity Estimates.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Competing sexual-asexual generic names in Agaricomycotina (Basidiomycota) with recommendations for use.IMA fungus · 2021Article
- The Role of Yeasts as Biocontrol Agents for Pathogenic Fungi on Postharvest Grapes: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Redefining genera of cereal pathogens:Fungal systematics and evolution · 2021Article
- New and Interesting Fungi. 3.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In advancing to one scientific name for fungi, this paper treats genera competing for use in the phylogenetically defined class Leotiomycetes except for genera of Erysiphales. Two groups traditionally included in the so-called "inoperculate discomycetes" have been excluded from this class and are also not included here, specifically Geoglossomycetes and Orbiliomycetes. A recommendation is made about the generic name to use in cases in which two or more generic names are synonyms or taxonomically congruent along with the rationale for the recommendation. In some cases the recommended generic name does not have priority or is based on an asexual type species, thus needs to be protected and ultimately approved according to Art. 57.2 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (ICN). A table is presented listing all competing generic names and their type species noting the recommended generic name. New combinations are introduced for the oldest epithet in the recommended genus including Ascocalyx berenice, Ascoconidium purpurascens, Ascocoryne albida, A. trichophora, Blumeriella filipendulae, B. ceanothi, Botrytis arachidis, B. fritillariae-pallidoflori, Calloria urticae, Calycellina aspera, Dematioscypha delicata, Dermea abietinum, D. boycei, D. stellata, Diplocarpon alpestre, D. fragariae, Godroniopsis peckii, Grovesinia moricola, Heterosphaera sublineolata, Hyphodiscus brachyconium, H. brevicollaris, H. luxurians, Leptotrochila campanulae, Monilinia polystroma, Neofabraea actinidae, N. citricarpa, N. vagabunda, Oculimacula aestiva, O. anguioides, Pezicula brunnea, P. californiae, P. cornina, P. diversispora, P. ericae, P. melanogena, P. querciphila, P. radicicola, P. rhizophila, Phialocephala piceae, Pilidium lythri, Rhabdocline laricis, Streptotinia streptothrix, Symphyosirinia parasitica, S. rosea, Unguiculariopsis caespitosa, and Vibrissea laxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.