ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2013
Risk of acute urinary retention associated with inhaled anticholinergics in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease: systematic review.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety analysis of long-acting dual bronchodilator after market approval: a real-world study from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Asthma-associated prostate enlargement and bladder smooth muscle hypercontractility: unveiling a potential link to LUTS.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Risk of Bladder Cancer in Patients with Chronic Indwelling Catheters: A Real-World Data Analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Recommendations of apex health bodies remain localized: not in conformity with international implementation policy for urological disorders.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- Article
- Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol-Induced Acute Urinary Retention as a Result of Medication Error: A Case Report and Review of Cases in the Literature.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetics, metabolite profiling, safety, and tolerability of inhalation aerosol of 101BHG-D01, a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Article
- A retrospective study to assess clinical characteristics and time to initiation of open-triple therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, newly established on long-acting mono- or combination therapy.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Observational
- Response to Wise et al. (Tiotropium safety in real life populations).British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Pharmacokinetic studies for proving bioequivalence of orally inhaled drug products-critical issues and concepts.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled anticholinergics (ipratropium bromide and tiotropium bromide) are widely used as maintenance treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Previous studies have reported on their cardiovascular effects but relatively little is known about their effects on the bladder. Acute urinary retention is a medical emergency which can be associated with serious complications. Our objective was to evaluate the existing literature regarding the effects of inhaled anticholinergics on urinary retention among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We searched PubMed and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse events database for case reports, observational studies, randomized controlled trials (or meta-analyses of such trials) that reported on the outcome of urinary retention with inhaled anticholinergics (ipratropium or tiotropium). We checked 27 published articles and identified relevant papers including two case reports, three pooled analyses, two observational studies and one randomized controlled trial. Two of the observational studies and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials reported a significant increase in the risk of acute urinary retention with inhaled anticholinergics. Older patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia seem to be at the highest risk of this adverse effect which tends to occur soon after treatment initiation. Although all the links in the chain have yet to be fully elucidated, the preponderance of evidence suggests the possibility of a causal relationship between inhaled anticholinergics and urinary retention. Clinicians should carefully balance these and other adverse effects of inhaled anticholinergics against their known symptomatic benefits on exacerbations, after eliciting patient preferences for various outcomes in a shared decision-making context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.