ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2012
Risks associated with tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: overview of the evidence to date.
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of tiotropium in patients switching from HandiHaler to Respimat in the TIOSPIR trial.BMJ open · 2015Trial
- The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat Trial (TIOSPIR), a large scale, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial-design and rationale.Respiratory research · 2013Trial
- Symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in clinical trials and in a population-based study.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2015Article
- Questionnaire on switching from the tiotropium HandiHaler to the Respimat inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: changes in handling and preferences immediately and several years after the switch.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Observational
- Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Article
- Tailoring of corticosteroids in COPD management.Current respiratory care reports · 2014Review
- Risk of acute urinary retention associated with inhaled anticholinergics in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease: systematic review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tiotropium is a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic agent that is widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It was initially launched as the tiotropium HandiHaler formulation, but this was followed by a newer version based on a potentially more efficient drug delivery device, known as Respimat. This Respimat formulation is available worldwide but has not yet succeeded in gaining regulatory approval in the USA. In the past few years, the adverse effects profile of tiotropium has come under close scrutiny owing to concerns about the possibility of urinary and cardiovascular adverse effects. These concerns appeared to have been alleviated following the publication of data from the Understanding Potential Long-Term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) trial, which was a large trial of 4 years' duration. This trial did not show any excess myocardial infarction, renal or urinary adverse events with tiotropium compared with placebo. However, the risk of urinary retention has been in the spotlight again following publication of two observational studies reporting a significantly increased risk of urinary retention in men recently started on inhaled anticholinergics, especially when prostatic hyperplasia coexists. More recently, a meta-analysis of mortality data for the tiotropium Respimat formulation raised the possibility of an increased risk of death, including death from cardiovascular causes. It is unclear if the more efficient drug delivery offered by the Respimat device is hitting a different part of the dose-toxicity curve. In the absence of any evidence of superior clinical efficacy with tiotropium Respimat compared with tiotropium HandiHaler, some experts have argued that there is no compelling reason to choose the Respimat formulation given the new uncertainties about its safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.