Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25083064›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Which strategy after first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer?

Coinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Coinu AndreaCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Petrelli FaustoCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Borgonovo Karen FrancescaCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Cabiddu MaryCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Ghilardi MaraCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Lonati VeronicaCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.
Barni SandroCoinu Andrea, Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen Francesca, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro, Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio, 24047 BG, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer is an integral part of the treatment strategy that needs to be set from the beginning for each patient, bearing in mind the expected toxicities of chosen treatments, the patient's clinical condition, comorbidities, preferences, the aims of the treatment and the molecular status. Furthermore, the distinction between lines of therapy is no longer absolute. The perspective of "continuum of care" includes switching chemotherapy prior to disease progression, maintenance therapy, drug "holidays" if needed, surgical resection of metastases in selected patients, and seems to allow a tailored treatment, in which patients are more likely to benefit from exposure to all active agents, which is known to correlate with overall survival. The scenario of second-line treatment has changed dramatically over the years and could currently benefit from several options including chemotherapy with a single agent or in combination and the addition of molecular-targeted agents developed in the last decade, such as epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab) and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting agents (bevacizumab, aflibercept), with the possibility of bevacizumab use even beyond first progression. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most important scientific data supporting the use of chemotherapy and the new biologic agents in the second-line setting in advanced colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsDrug SubstitutionHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPatient SelectionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSalvage TherapyTreatment FailureAdvanced colorectal cancerOverall survivalPolychemotherapySecond-lineTargeted agents

Identifiers

PMID25083064
PMCPMC4112862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.