Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25082761›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

Can MRI predict subsequent pseudarthrosis resulting from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?

Hirotsugu Omi, Toru Yokoyama, Atsushi Ono, Takuya Numasawa, Kanichiro Wada, Yoichi Fujisawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vertebral compression fractures managed with brace: risk factors for progression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The factors related to the poor ADL in the patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture after instrumentation surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2014.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Review
  15. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2014.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hirotsugu OmiTakaoka Seishikai Orthopaedic Hospital, Oote-machi 8-31, Takaoka, Toyama, 933-0039, Japan, omi0403@gmail.com.
Toru Yokoyama
Atsushi Ono
Takuya Numasawa
Kanichiro Wada
Yoichi Fujisawa
Hirosaki University · JPOrthopaedic Hospital · USUji Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the ability of short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) in magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

methodsWe analyzed 63 vertebrae of 56 patients who had osteoporotic vertebral fracture (Th10-L2) prospectively. Image finding of a homogeneous high signal change on a fractured vertebra was evaluated and all vertebrae were divided into "homogenous high signal change group" or "non-homogenous high signal change group". On the other hand, image finding of linear black signal area was evaluated and all vertebrae were divided into "linear black signal area group" or "non-linear black signal area group".

resultsSixteen and 24 vertebrae were included in the homogenous high signal change group or the linear black signal area group, respectively. The 16 homogenous high signal change cases did not result in non-union, and 47 non-homogenous high signal change cases resulted in 14 non-unions, a significant difference. Twenty-four linear black signal area and 39 non-linear black signal area cases resulted in 10, and 4 non-unions, respectively, also a significant difference. The kyphosis progression rate of the linear black signal area group (mean 35%) was significantly higher than that of non-linear black signal area group (mean 23%). The visual analog scale of back pain of the linear black signal area group (mean 35 mm) was significantly higher than that of the non-linear black signal area group (mean 23 mm).

conclusionsSTIR was useful for predicting bone union, kyphosis, and back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Indexed as

AgedBack PainDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKyphosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesPain MeasurementProspective StudiesPseudarthrosisSpinal FracturesSpine

Identifiers

PMID25082761
OpenAlexW1990788071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.