Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25082423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Minimally invasive endoscopic staging for mediastinal lymphadenopathy in lung cancer: a systematic review protocol.

Hong Liu, Jie Zhou, Qiao-ling Feng, Gang Wan, Yong-jun Xie, Hai-tao Gu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hong LiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiao-ling FengKey Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine of Education Ministry, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Gang WanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yong-jun XieNational Center for Medical Simulation of China, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China Department of Histo-anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Hai-tao GuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNChengdu Medical College · CNChongqing Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimally invasive endoscopic biopsy techniques have been widely available as potential alternatives for mediastinal lesions staging in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. Previous efforts have been made to evaluate the diagnostic performance of specific endoscopic modality alone at the level of the mediastinum for staging lung cancer, however, few studies focus on the accuracy of comparisons between different endoscopic modalities, especially at the level of any individual lymph node station. The objective of our study is to determine the diagnostic yields of different endoscopic modalities for staging mediastinal lymphadenopathy in lung cancer, especially concerning the individual lymph node station. METHODS/

designA systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SinoMed and ISI Web of Science were performed to identify studies evaluating endoscopic modalities accuracy with restriction of English and Chinese languages from inception to an update until May 2014. Data were extracted with the patient as the unit of analysis with regards to the abilities of different endoscopic modalities at the level of mediastinum and particular lymph node station. The methodological quality was assessed independently according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study (QADAS) criteria. An exact binomial rendition of bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Also, pre-post probability analysis, publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed for a synthesis of knowledge of this context. DISSEMINATION: The findings will advance our better available knowledge of optimal clinical decision-making when dealing with staging of mediastinal metastasis in lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO-NIHR Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42014009792).

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleEndosonographyHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic DiseasesMediastinal DiseasesMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25082423
PMCPMC4120311
OpenAlexW2154913842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.