ReviewInternational orthopaedics2014
Is routine ulnar nerve transposition necessary in open release of stiff elbows? Our experience and a literature review.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications of Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Systematic Review.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Preoperative risk factors associated with patient outcomes following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.JSES international · 2026Article
- Is anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve necessary for post-traumatic elbow stiffness? A retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Ulnar Nerve Management in Complex Elbow Dislocations: A Retrospective Monocentric Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for open elbow arthrolysis : the Shanghai Prediction model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome.The bone & joint journal · 2022Article
- Return to play rates after ulnar nerve transposition and decompression surgery: a retrospective analysis.JSES international · 2021Article
- Open elbow arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: an update.Bone & joint open · 2020Article
- The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Multiple rare causes of post-traumatic elbow stiffness in an adolescent patient: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Review
- Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Post-traumatic stiff elbow.EFORT open reviews · 2018Article
- Effect on muscle strength of the upper extremities after open elbow arthrolysis.JSES open access · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProphylactic release of the ulnar nerve to reduce the incidence of postoperative nerve symptoms in stiff elbows has been recommended. However, the necessity for routine anterior transposition remains unclear. In this study, we aim to gain an insight into the value of routine transposition in open release of stiff elbows.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 94 patients suffering from elbow stiffness with no pre-operative ulnar nerve symptoms. Simple decompression (with in situ decompression or epicondylectomy) and subcutaneous anterior transposition were chronologically performed in 53 and 37 patients, respectively. Another four patients were treated by a single lateral approach with no intervention of the ulnar nerve. Pre- and postoperative range of motion and incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms were recorded. The function of ulnar nerve was measured by Amadio rating scale.
resultsThe incidence of ulnar nerve dysfuction was 18.9% (ten of 53) and 8.1% (three of 37) in the simple decompression and transposition groups, respectively. The mean Amadio scores were 7.62 and 8.22, respectively. All these data showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In the lateral approach group, 50 % (two of four) of patients developed nerve symptoms with a mean Amadio score of 6.50.
conclusionsThe transposition group exhibited a superior nervous outcomes compared with the simple decompression group. No comparison was conducted between the transposition and lateral approach groups because of too few patients in the latter. According to related literature and our experience, we conclude that routine transposition is necessary to prevent postoperative nerve symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.