Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25081836›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2015

Association of eight EST-derived SNPs with carcass and meat quality traits in pigs.

Xiong Tong, Zhe Zhang, Yiren Jiao, Jian Xu, Hongquyen Dang, Ye Chen, Zhiguo Jiang, Junli Duan, Hao Zhang, Jiaqi Li and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiong TongCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Zhe Zhang
Yiren Jiao
Jian Xu
Hongquyen Dang
Ye Chen
Zhiguo Jiang
Junli Duan
Hao Zhang
Jiaqi Li
Chong Wang
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of genetic markers associated with important economic traits is fundamental to improving the productivity and quality of livestock. In this investigation, we searched for 177 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) putatively involved in meat quality from the available pig EST database, and detected eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in eight ESTs. We investigated the associations of these SNPs with 18 carcass and meat quality traits in a Landrace × Lantang F2 resource population (n = 257). Association analysis revealed that seven SNPs (except E42) were associated with some of the carcass- and meat quality-related traits. Particularly, significant associations of three SNPs (E53, E82, and E36) with backfat thickness traits were observed. Further, the genetic effects of E53 on four live backfat thickness traits were validated in an independent population (n = 221). More investigations about E53 sequence characteristics were performed, i.e., radiation hybrid (RH) mapping, 3'-RACE, and screening analysis of the positive BAC clones. Our research identified the genetic effects of eight EST-derived SNPs on carcass and meat quality traits, and suggested that E53 may be a useful marker for live backfat thickness traits in pig breeding programs.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdiposityAnimalsFemaleGenotypeMaleMeatPhenotypeRadiation Hybrid MappingSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID25081836
OpenAlexW1981173196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.