Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25081738›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015

Optimized viewing angles for cardiac electrophysiology ablation procedures.

Martin Koch, Matthias Hoffmann, Marcus Pfister, Joachim Hornegger, Norbert Strobel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin KochPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martensstr. 3, 91058 , Erlangen, Germany, Martin.Koch@cs.fau.de.
Matthias Hoffmann
Marcus Pfister
Joachim Hornegger
Norbert Strobel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCatheter ablation is a common treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). Interventional C-arm X-ray systems are used for guiding AF procedures, employing standard view positions. Since the projection angles are not adapted to the individual patient anatomy, standard projections do not necessarily offer the best views of important anatomical structures. Using a pre-procedural 3D data set acquired with MRI or CT, suitable ablation sites (lines) can be identified in advance so an ablation plan can be superimposed on fluoroscopic images to guide the procedure.

methodsA method was developed to estimate optimized projection views for biplane X-ray C-arm systems based on planning data for AF ablation procedures. The estimated viewing angles were compared to standard angulations using an objective quality metric, the length of the planned ablation line as seen under X-ray. This method was tested using 35 clinical datasets annotated with planned ablation lines for ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation.

resultsThe optimized views computed using the new method yielded 28 % less foreshortening of pre-planned ablation lines on average. In one case, anatomy-based view calculation lead to a 69 % reduction in foreshortening.

conclusionThe commonly used standard views provide reasonable a priori choices, and some improvement is possible by switching among common angulations depending on the treatment region. Further gains are possible by using anatomy-optimized biplane C-arm angulations.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiography, InterventionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.