Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25081624›Full record

ReviewProgress in molecular biology and translational science2014

Mechanical force sensing in tissues.

Soline Chanet, Adam C Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Hierarchical Mechanotransduction System: From Macro to Micro.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional maturation of kidney organoid tubules: PIEZO1-mediated CaAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soline ChanetDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Adam C MartinDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Investigating the generation of mechanical forces during tissue invaginationR01GM105984 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARTIN, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2013 to 2021
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM105984NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue size, shape, and organization reflect individual cell behaviors such as proliferation, shape change, and movement. Evidence suggests that mechanical signals operate in tandem with biochemical cues to properly coordinate cell behavior and pattern tissues. The objective of this chapter is to present recent evidence demonstrating that forces transmitted between cells act as signals that coordinate cell behavior across tissues. We first briefly summarize molecular and cellular mechanisms by which forces are sensed by cells with an emphasis on forces generated and transmitted by cytoskeletal networks. We then discuss evidence for these mechanisms operating in multicellular contexts to coordinate complex cell and tissue behaviors that occur during embryonic development: specifically growth and morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularOrgan SpecificityAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMorphogenesisActinAdhesionCell divisionCytoskeletonForcesMechanicsMechanotransductionMyosinTissuesYAP/TAZ

Identifiers

PMID25081624
PMCPMC4412274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.