ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2014
Molecular dynamics studies on the influences of a gradient electric field on the water chain in a peptide nanotube.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Water in Nanopores and Biological Channels: A Molecular Simulation Perspective.Chemical reviews · 2020Review
- Applications of cyclic peptide nanotubes (cPNTs).Journal of food and drug analysis · 2019Review
- Different transport behaviors of NH4 (+) and NH3 in transmembrane cyclic peptide nanotubes.Journal of molecular modeling · 2016Article
- Transport properties of simple organic molecules in a transmembrane cyclic peptide nanotube.Journal of molecular modeling · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structure and transportation characteristics of the water chain inside a 8×cyclo-(WL)4 peptide nanotube (PNT) were simulated under a gradient electric (GE) field. The gradient was defined by the ratio of a constant (Ea) and the z-directional length (Lz) of the simulation box. Ea varies from 0.0 to 0.9 V nm(-1). As the gradient increases, the probabilities of finding two water molecules in an α-plane zone and three in a midplane region increase. To accommodate more water molecules, the axial array of channel water molecules becomes more compact. Meanwhile, the H-bonded network between the channel water is greatly intensified when Ea increases from 0.3 to 0.9 V nm(-1). Nevertheless, the proportion of strong H-bonds does not increase significantly following the formation of a more compact axial array of water molecules. When Ea reaches 0.9 V nm(-1), the water molecule in an α-plane zone may be dragged by its neighboring water molecules into the midplane region, resulting in a significant deviation from the channel axis. With the augment of the gradient, the dipoles of channel water are gradually oriented along the tube axis in the sequence from gap 1 to 7, namely along the direction of the electric field. Nevertheless, even when E a reaches 0.9 V nm(-1), the dipole orientation of the channel water is not complete, and dipole flips still occur in gap 7. Under a GE field, the rightward and leftward hopping rates of channel water are no longer equal to each other, i.e., channel water performs an asymmetric transportation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25081606What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.