ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2014
[Advances in cryoballoon technology: benefits and risks in daily practice].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCryoballoon ablation is nowadays a standard approach for pulmonary vein isolation in symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second generation cryoballoon was introduced in 2012 and modifications and enhancement to the system promised a higher efficiency. OBJECTIVES, MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive overview of advances in cryoballoon ablation is provided and the consequences for daily practice are described based on a PubMed literature search, taking into account own experiences. RESULTS AND
conclusionAdvances in cryoballoon ablation result in a significantly higher efficiency. To maintain the overall safety of the procedure and to avoid phrenic nerve palsy and esophageal lesions, special care needs to be taken by following some safety aspects and cut-off criteria. More data are necessary to clarify if recommendations for cryoenergy titration with the new balloon are reasonable. Ongoing prospective studies comparing cryoballoon and radiofrequency (RF) ablation will give answers to the question which energy source is more favorable, and upcoming studies will evaluate the impact of cryoballoon ablation as a first line treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25081597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.