SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Evaluating the association of polymorphisms in the HAP1 gene with lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Huntingtin Interacting Proteins and Pathological Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies on the relationship of HAP1 polymorphisms (-141 T > G; 1349 T > G) and lung cancer risk to date indicated controversial results. This study was devised to clarify whether the polymorphisms predispose to lung cancer. We searched Embase and PubMed up to March 2014 to identify relevant studies. Data from the eligible studies were independently extracted by two investigators. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the associations between lung cancer risk and the abovementioned polymorphisms. A total of 15 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. Both overall analysis and stratified analysis by ethnicity and smoking status indicated no association between lung cancer risk and the 1349 T > G polymorphism. However, a significantly reduced risk of lung cancer was found among carriers of the GG genotype of the -141 T > G polymorphism, as compared with those of the TT genotype (homozygote model: OR = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.93, P(OR) = 0.002). Likewise, the GG genotype was also found to decrease lung cancer risk compared to the GT + TT genotypes (recessive model: OR = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.73 to 0.92, P(OR) = 0.001). Our meta-analysis suggests that the -141 T > G polymorphism, but not the 1349 T > G polymorphism, may have protective effects for lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.