ArticleBMC medical education2014
A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline.
Article in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Correlation of NBME pharmacology subject exam performance with medical school internal pharmacology scores and academic metrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identifying the Health Educational Needs of Refugees: Empirical Evidence from a Delphi Study.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a job aid: Tool to reduce infections in home-based stroke.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024Article
- Improving self-directed learning ability of medical students using the blended teaching method: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Delphi consensus recommendation for optimization of pulmonary hypertension therapy focusing on switching from a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor to riociguat.Pulmonary circulation · 2022Article
- Management of repository corticotropin injection therapy for non-infectious uveitis: a Delphi study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2021Article
- National Competencies for Registered Nurses in Primary Care: A Delphi Study.Western journal of nursing research · 2020Article
- A Modified Delphi Study to Prioritize Content for a Simulation-based Pediatric Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residency Training Programs.AEM education and training · 2020Article
- Expert consensus on the management of adverse events and prescribing practices associated with the treatment of patients taking pirfenidone for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a Delphi consensus study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Article
- Delphi consensus recommendations for a treatment algorithm in pulmonary sarcoidosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Review
- Management of repository corticotrophin injection therapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis: a Delphi study.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Review
- Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Article
- A Modified Delphi Study for Development of a Pediatric Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents.AEM education and training · 2017Article
- Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation.Pulmonary circulation · 2017Article
- Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET).BMC medical education · 2016Observational
- The effectiveness and feasibility of an online educational program for improving evidence-based practice literacy: an exploratory randomized study of US chiropractors.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2016Article
- Aligning Theory and Design: The Development of an Online Learning Intervention to Teach Evidence-based Practice for Maximal Reach.Global advances in health and medicine · 2015Article
- Recommendations for the clinical management of patients receiving macitentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): A Delphi consensus document.Pulmonary circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndertaking a Delphi exercise is recommended during the second stage in the development process for a reporting guideline. To continue the development for the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based practice Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) a Delphi survey was undertaken to determine the consensus opinion of researchers, journal editors and educators in evidence-based practice (EBP) regarding the information items that should be reported when describing an educational intervention for EBP.
methodsA four round online Delphi survey was conducted from October 2012 to March 2013. The Delphi panel comprised international researchers, educators and journal editors in EBP. Commencing with an open-ended question, participants were invited to volunteer information considered important when reporting educational interventions for EBP. Over three subsequent rounds participants were invited to rate the importance of each of the Delphi items using an 11 point Likert rating scale (low 0 to 4, moderate 5 to 6, high 7 to 8 and very high >8). Consensus agreement was set a priori as at least 80 per cent participant agreement. Consensus agreement was initially calculated within the four categories of importance (low to very high), prior to these four categories being merged into two (<7 and ≥7). Descriptive statistics for each item were computed including the mean Likert scores, standard deviation (SD), range and median participant scores. Mean absolute deviation from the median (MAD-M) was also calculated as a measure of participant disagreement.
resultsThirty-six experts agreed to participate and 27 (79%) participants completed all four rounds. A total of 76 information items were generated across the four survey rounds. Thirty-nine items (51%) were specific to describing the intervention (as opposed to other elements of study design) and consensus agreement was achieved for two of these items (5%). When the four rating categories were merged into two (<7 and ≥7), 18 intervention items achieved consensus agreement.
conclusionThis Delphi survey has identified 39 items for describing an educational intervention for EBP. These Delphi intervention items will provide the groundwork for the subsequent consensus discussion to determine the final inclusion of items in the GREET, the first reporting guideline for educational interventions in EBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.