Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25081206›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Promoter-proximal transcription factor binding is transcriptionally active when coupled with nucleosome repositioning in immediate vicinity.

Vinod Kumar Yadav, Ram Krishna Thakur, Bruce Eckloff, Aradhita Baral, Ankita Singh, Rashi Halder, Akinchan Kumar, Mohammad Parwez Alam, Tapas K Kundu, Raj Pandita and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Crosstalk between G-quadruplex and ROS.Cell death & disease · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of a group I Nme protein of Capsaspora owczarzaki-a close unicellular relative of animals.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Article
  6. NM23/NDPK proteins in transcription regulatory functions and chromatin modulation: emerging trends.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Review
  7. Nuclear functions of NME proteins.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic suppression of human telomerase (The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  10. Small molecule selectively suppresses MYC transcription in cancer cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinod Kumar YadavGNR Center for Genome Informatics, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Ram Krishna ThakurProteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Bruce EckloffAdvanced Genomics Technology Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aradhita BaralProteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Ankita SinghProteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Rashi HalderGNR Center for Genome Informatics, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Akinchan KumarProteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Mohammad Parwez AlamDr B.R. Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India.
Tapas K KunduTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur P.O., Bangalore 560064, India.
Raj PanditaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Tej K PanditaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Eric D WiebenAdvanced Genomics Technology Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shantanu ChowdhuryGNR Center for Genome Informatics, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India Proteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, India shantanuc@igib.res.in.
Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INHouston Methodist · USMayo Clinic · USJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

CHROMATIN MODIFYING FACTORS CONTROL RADIATION RESPONSE AND GENOMIC STABILITYR01CA129537 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 2008 to 2018
$3.3M
Tumor-cell-specific targets for combined hyperthermia and radiation effectsR01CA154320 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Role of Heterochromatin protein 1 Beta in Genome Maintenance and OncogenesisR01GM109768 · NIGMS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PANDITA, TEJ K · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance 500127-Z-09-ZNCI NIH HHS CA129537NCI NIH HHS CA154320NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129537NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154320NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109768Wellcome Trust 500127/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have analyzed patterns of transcription, transcription factor (TF) binding or mapped nucleosome occupancy across the genome. These suggest that the three aspects are genetically connected but the cause and effect relationships are still unknown. For example, physiologic TF binding studies involve many TFs, consequently, it is difficult to assign nucleosome reorganization to the binding site occupancy of any particular TF. Therefore, several aspects remain unclear: does TF binding influence nucleosome (re)organizations locally or impact the chromatin landscape at a more global level; are all or only a fraction of TF binding a result of reorganization in nucleosome occupancy and do all TF binding and associated changes in nucleosome occupancy result in altered gene expression? With these in mind, following characterization of two states (before and after induction of a single TF of choice) we determined: (i) genomic binding sites of the TF, (ii) promoter nucleosome occupancy and (iii) transcriptome profiles. Results demonstrated that promoter-proximal TF binding influenced expression of the target gene when it was coupled to nucleosome repositioning at or close to its binding site in most cases. In contrast, only in few cases change in target gene expression was found when TF binding occurred without local nucleosome reorganization.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticBinding SitesCell Line, TumorGenome, HumanHumansLung NeoplasmsNM23 Nucleoside Diphosphate KinasesNucleosomesTranscription FactorsNM23 Nucleoside Diphosphate KinasesNME2 protein, humanNucleosomesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25081206
PMCPMC4150765
OpenAlexW2043011910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.