Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25081064›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2015

Current Approach to Dry Eye Disease.

Valéria Valim, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani, Jacqueline Martins de Sousa, Verônica Silva Vilela, Rubens Belfort

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Systemic diseases and the cornea.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development ofThe open ophthalmology journal · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Valéria ValimCentro de Referência de Doenças Reumáticas, Serviço de Reumatologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes, Rua Marechal Campos, 1468, Maruípe, Vitória, ES, Brazil, 29040-091. val.valim@gmail.com.
Virginia Fernandes Moça TrevisaniDisciplina de Medicina de Urgência e Medicina Baseada em Evidências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740 Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-062.
Jacqueline Martins de SousaEscola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Departamento de Oftalmologia e Ciências Visuais, Rua Botucatu 820, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-062.
Verônica Silva VilelaDisciplina de Reumatologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida 28 de Setembro 77, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 20551-900.
Rubens BelfortEscola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Departamento de Oftalmologia e Ciências Visuais, Rua Botucatu 820, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-062.
Associação Paulista de Medicina · BRUniversidade de Santo Amaro · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that causes tear film instability with potential damage to the ocular surface. The prevalence of dry eye in the world population ranges from 6 to 34 %. It is more common in those aged over 50, and affects mainly women. Since the introduction of the Schirmer's test in 1903, other tests have been developed to evaluate dry eye, such as biomicroscopy, the tear film breakup time (BUT), vital dyes (lissamine green and rose bengal), fluorescein, leaf fern test, corneal sensitivity test, conjunctiva impression cytology, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and tear osmolarity measurement. Although there is no gold standard, it is advisable to combine at least two tests. Strategies for treating DED have recently been modified and include patient education, tear substitute, corticosteroids, secretagogues, fatty acids, immunomodulators, occlusion of lacrimal puncta surgery and, tarsorrhaphy. Biological therapy and new topical immunomodulators such as tacrolimus, tofacitinib and IL-1 receptor inhibitor are being tested. In this review, the evaluation tests for dry eye are compared and the main studies on treatment are presented, with emphasis on studies in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. The authors propose an approach for the management of dry eye.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyAge FactorsAnimalsDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresSex FactorsSjogren's SyndromeTomography, Optical CoherenceImmunologic FactorsCorneaDry eye diseaseOcular surfaceSjögren’s syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25081064
OpenAlexW2018155678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.