Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25080281›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2014

Adherence to warfarin treatment among patients with atrial fibrillation.

Mika Skeppholm, Leif Friberg

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Neuropsychological impact of cerebral microemboli in ablation of atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lower-adherence direct oral anticoagulant use is associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events than warfarin.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A prospective, multi-center cohort study: investigating the ability of warfarin-treated patients to predict their INR.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and a presumed "temporary cause" in a community-based cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. General practitioners' adherence to chronic heart failure guidelines regarding medication: the GP-HF study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Physical activity, symptoms, medication and subjective health among veteran endurance athletes with atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mika SkeppholmClinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine/Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, mika.skeppholm@ds.se.
Leif Friberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment with warfarin greatly reduces the risk of stroke related to atrial fibrillation, but will not be effective unless patients adhere to treatment. Lack of fixed dosing makes it difficult to objectively estimate adherence to treatment from prescription data.

objectiveTo evaluate two methods that assess adherence to warfarin from prescription data.

designRetrospective study of Swedish health care registers. PATIENTS AND

methodsAge- and sex-specific dose requirements were determined from approx. 1 million blood tests and dosing instructions. By applying these dosages to 163,785 warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation, we calculated the quantity of warfarin that was needed to keep these patients on effective treatment during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years and compared that with the dispensed quantities. The ratio of available drug/time at risk constitutes a measure of adherence on group level. In addition, time intervals between refills were used to assess discontinuation.

resultsBoth methods showed that 45% of the patients did not have enough warfarin to last 80% of the time at risk. Between 16 and 21% of the patients discontinued within the first year, followed by 8-9% annually during the following years. Patients with high bleeding risk and patients with low embolic risk showed lower endurance.

conclusionsAdherence to treatment with warfarin can be estimated on group level from prescription data and may be useful for comparison of adherence with warfarin and new oral anticoagulants. When applied to a large warfarin-treated cohort with atrial fibrillation, we found that adherence is low and that measures aiming for improvements are needed .

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.