Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25079960›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Risk of dengue for tourists and teams during the World Cup 2014 in Brazil.

Willem G van Panhuis, Sangwon Hyun, Kayleigh Blaney, Ernesto T A Marques, Giovanini E Coelho, João Bosco Siqueira, Ryan Tibshirani, Jarbas B da Silva, Roni Rosenfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New microbes and new infections · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Superensemble forecasts of dengue outbreaks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dengue: update on epidemiology.Current infectious disease reports · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Willem G van PanhuisUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Sangwon HyunCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kayleigh BlaneyUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ernesto T A MarquesUniversity of Pittsburgh Center for Vaccine Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Giovanini E CoelhoBrazil Ministério da Saúde, Brasilia, Departamento Federal, Brazil.
João Bosco SiqueiraUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Ryan TibshiraniCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jarbas B da SilvaBrazil Ministério da Saúde, Brasilia, Departamento Federal, Brazil.
Roni RosenfeldCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Carnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

Training, Outreach & Diversity ComponentU54GM088491 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROBERTS, MARK STENIUS · 2009 to 2018
$16.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5U54GM088491NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis year, Brazil will host about 600,000 foreign visitors during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. The concern of possible dengue transmission during this event has been raised given the high transmission rates reported in the past by this country. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe used dengue incidence rates reported by each host city during previous years (2001-2013) to estimate the risk of dengue during the World Cup for tourists and teams. Two statistical models were used: a percentile rank (PR) and an Empirical Bayes (EB) model. Expected IR's during the games were generally low (<10/100,000) but predictions varied across locations and between models. Based on current ticket allocations, the mean number of expected symptomatic dengue cases ranged from 26 (PR, 10th-100th percentile: 5-334 cases) to 59 (EB, 95% credible interval: 30-77 cases) among foreign tourists but none are expected among teams. These numbers will highly depend on actual travel schedules and dengue immunity among visitors. Sensitivity analysis for both models indicated that the expected number of cases could be as low as 4 or 5 with 100,000 visitors and as high as 38 or 70 with 800,000 visitors (PR and EB, respectively). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The risk of dengue among tourists during the World Cup is expected to be small due to immunity among the Brazil host population provided by last year's epidemic with the same DENV serotypes. Quantitative risk estimates by different groups and methodologies should be made routinely for mass gathering events.

Indexed as

TravelBrazilDengueHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25079960
PMCPMC4120682
OpenAlexW2098155356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.