Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25079948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proteasome inhibitors alter levels of intracellular peptides in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells.

Sayani Dasgupta, Leandro M Castro, Russell Dulman, Ciyu Yang, Marion Schmidt, Emer S Ferro, Lloyd D Fricker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Limitations of Mass Spectrometry-Based Peptidomic Approaches.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Peptidomics of Zebrafish Brain in a 6-OHDA-Induced Neurodegeneration Model.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Methods for Intracellular Peptidomic Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Quantitative Peptidomics: General Considerations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Quantitative Peptidomics Using Reductive Methylation of Amines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Origins, Technological Advancement, and Applications of Peptidomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Neurolysin Knockout Mice in a Diet-Induced Obesity Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Isolation of Proteasome-Trapped Peptides (PTPs) for Degradome Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of cellular proteostasis in antitumor immunity.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peptidome: Chaos or Inevitability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sayani DasguptaDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Leandro M CastroDepartment of Pharmacology, Support Center for Research in Proteolysis and Cell Signaling, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Russell DulmanDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Ciyu YangDepartment of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Marion SchmidtDepartment of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Emer S FerroDepartment of Pharmacology, Support Center for Research in Proteolysis and Cell Signaling, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lloyd D FrickerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

REGULATION OF ENKEPHALIN CONVERTASE--CARBOXYPEPTIDASE ER01DA004494 · NIDA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI FRICKER, LLOYD D · 1987 to 2015
$5.9M
UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN CONJUGATES AND FUSIONSR01GM043601 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI FINLEY, DANIEL J · 1990 to 2020
$4.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004494NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-004494NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043601NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM-43601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteasome cleaves intracellular proteins into peptides. Earlier studies found that treatment of human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells with epoxomicin (an irreversible proteasome inhibitor) generally caused a decrease in levels of intracellular peptides. However, bortezomib (an antitumor drug and proteasome inhibitor) caused an unexpected increase in the levels of most intracellular peptides in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells. To address this apparent paradox, quantitative peptidomics was used to study the effect of a variety of other proteasome inhibitors on peptide levels in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells. Inhibitors tested included carfilzomib, MG132, MG262, MLN2238, AM114, and clasto-Lactacystin β-lactone. Only MG262 caused a substantial elevation in peptide levels that was comparable to the effect of bortezomib, although carfilzomib and MLN2238 elevated the levels of some peptides. To explore off-target effects, the proteosome inhibitors were tested with various cellular peptidases. Bortezomib did not inhibit tripeptidyl peptidase 2 and only weakly inhibited cellular aminopeptidase activity, as did some of the other proteasome inhibitors. However, potent inhibitors of tripeptidyl peptidase 2 (butabindide) and cellular aminopeptidases (bestatin) did not substantially alter the peptidome, indicating that the increase in peptide levels due to proteasome inhibitors is not a result of peptidase inhibition. Although we cannot exclude other possibilities, we presume that the paradoxical increase in peptide levels upon treatment with bortezomib and other inhibitors is the result of allosteric effects of these compounds on the proteasome. Because intracellular peptides are likely to be functional, it is possible that some of the physiologic effects of bortezomib and carfilzomib arise from the perturbation of peptide levels inside the cell.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibCell Line, TumorHEK293 CellsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Intracellular SpaceLeupeptinsOligopeptidesPeptidesProteasome InhibitorsPyrazinesAntineoplastic Agentsbenzyloxycarbonylleucyl-leucyl-leucine aldehydeBoronic AcidsBortezomibcarfilzomibLeupeptinsOligopeptidesPeptidesProteasome InhibitorsPyrazines

Identifiers

PMID25079948
PMCPMC4117522
OpenAlexW2033748252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.