ArticleGenome biology2014
A simple metric of promoter architecture robustly predicts expression breadth of human genes suggesting that most transcription factors are positive regulators.
Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- MAGNETIC: a web server to fetch gene network based on motif distribution in promoters.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Motif distribution in genomes gives insights into gene clustering and co-regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Sexual size dimorphism in mammals is associated with changes in the size of gene families related to brain development.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Selection on synonymous sites: the unwanted transcript hypothesis.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Virtual Gene Concept and a Corresponding Pragmatic Research Program in Genetical Data Science.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Global patterns of enhancer activity during sea urchin embryogenesis assessed by eRNA profiling.Genome research · 2021Article
- K-mer Content Changes with Node Degree in Promoter-Enhancer Network of Mouse ES Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Emergence of co-expression in gene regulatory networks.PloS one · 2021Article
- Models of the Gene Must Inform Data-Mining Strategies in Genomics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
- 1700108J01Rik and 1700101O22Rik are mouse testis-specific long non-coding RNAs.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018Article
- Modelling of the breadth of expression from promoter architectures identifies pro-housekeeping transcription factors.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Constrained Maximal Expression Level Owing to Haploidy Shapes Gene Content on the Mammalian X Chromosome.PLoS biology · 2015Article
- Paradigm shifts in genomics through the FANTOM projects.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015Article
- Populational landscape of INDELs affecting transcription factor-binding sites in humans.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Mapping Mammalian Cell-type-specific Transcriptional Regulatory Networks Using KD-CAGE and ChIP-seq Data in the TC-YIK Cell Line.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional wisdom holds that, owing to the dominance of features such as chromatin level control, the expression of a gene cannot be readily predicted from knowledge of promoter architecture. This is reflected, for example, in a weak or absent correlation between promoter divergence and expression divergence between paralogs. However, an inability to predict may reflect an inability to accurately measure or employment of the wrong parameters. Here we address this issue through integration of two exceptional resources: ENCODE data on transcription factor binding and the FANTOM5 high-resolution expression atlas.
resultsConsistent with the notion that in eukaryotes most transcription factors are activating, the number of transcription factors binding a promoter is a strong predictor of expression breadth. In addition, evolutionarily young duplicates have fewer transcription factor binders and narrower expression. Nonetheless, we find several binders and cooperative sets that are disproportionately associated with broad expression, indicating that models more complex than simple correlations should hold more predictive power. Indeed, a machine learning approach improves fit to the data compared with a simple correlation. Machine learning could at best moderately predict tissue of expression of tissue specific genes.
conclusionsWe find robust evidence that some expression parameters and paralog expression divergence are strongly predictable with knowledge of transcription factor binding repertoire. While some cooperative complexes can be identified, consistent with the notion that most eukaryotic transcription factors are activating, a simple predictor, the number of binding transcription factors found on a promoter, is a robust predictor of expression breadth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.