Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25079678›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2014

Association of learning styles with research self-efficacy: study of short-term research training program for medical students.

Jill Dumbauld, Michelle Black, Colin A Depp, Rebecca Daly, Maureen A Curran, Babbi Winegarden, Dilip V Jeste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. American Psychiatric Association's Leadership Fellowship Program: Short-term and Longer-term Outcomes.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jill DumbauldDepartment of Psychiatry, Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, and Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Michelle Black
Colin A Depp
Rebecca Daly
Maureen A Curran
Babbi Winegarden
Dilip V Jeste

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000100 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2012 to 2015
$19.7M
Research Training Program in Geriatric Neuropsychiatry for Medical StudentsR25MH071544 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JESTE, DILIP V. · 2004 to 2013
$2.5M
UCSD Medical Student Summer Aging Research TrainingT35AG026757 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Benjamin Hyun Han, Ellen Eun-Ok Lee · 2005 to 2026
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS NCRS UL1TR000100NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000100NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIA NIH HHS T35 AG026757NIA NIH HHS T35 AG26757NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH071544NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH71544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith a growing need for developing future physician scientists, identifying characteristics of medical students who are likely to benefit from research training programs is important. This study assessed if specific learning styles of medical students, participating in federally funded short-term research training programs, were associated with research self-efficacy, a potential predictor of research career success.

methodSeventy-five first-year medical students from 28 medical schools, selected to participate in two competitive NIH-supported summer programs for research training in aging, completed rating scales to evaluate learning styles at baseline, and research self-efficacy before and after training. We examined associations of individual learning styles (visual-verbal, sequential-global, sensing-intuitive, and active-reflective) with students' gender, ranking of medical school, and research self-efficacy.

resultsResearch self-efficacy improved significantly following the training programs. Students with a verbal learning style reported significantly greater research self-efficacy at baseline, while visual, sequential, and intuitive learners demonstrated significantly greater increases in research self-efficacy from baseline to posttraining. No significant relationships were found between learning styles and students' gender or ranking of their medical school.

conclusionsAssessments of learning styles may provide useful information to guide future training endeavors aimed at developing the next generation of physician-scientists.

Indexed as

LearningSelf EfficacyStudents, MedicalHumansResearchlearning stylesmedical educationphysician scientistresearch self-efficacyresearch training

Identifiers

PMID25079678
PMCPMC4268258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.