ArticleBMC genetics2014
Holm multiple correction for large-scale gene-shape association mapping.
Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is the predictive validity of clinical placement sign-off forms for medical students?BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Associations between plasma metabolism-associated proteins and future development of giant cell arteritis: results from a prospective study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- What are Supervisor Perceptions of Clinical Placement Sign-off Forms for Medical Students?Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Analyses of plasma inflammatory proteins reveal biomarkers predictive of subsequent development of giant cell arteritis: a prospective study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Menstrual problems in chronic immune thrombocytopenia: A monthly challenge - a cohort study and review.British journal of haematology · 2022Review
- Multivariate genome-wide association study of leaf shape in a Populus deltoides and P. simonii F1 pedigree.PloS one · 2021Article
- Identification of Hub Genes and MicroRNAs Associated With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension by Integrated Bioinformatics Analyses.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Enhancer histone-QTLs are enriched on autoimmune risk haplotypes and influence gene expression within chromatin networks.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Dynamics of Gut Microbiome in Giant Panda Cubs Reveal Transitional Microbes and Pathways in Early Life.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- An Analytic Solution to the Computation of Power and Sample Size for Genetic Association Studies under a Pleiotropic Mode of Inheritance.Human heredity · 2016Article
- A graphical weighted power improving multiplicity correction approach for SNP selections.Current genomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLinkage Disequilibrium (LD) is a powerful approach for the identification and characterization of morphological shape, which usually involves multiple genetic markers. However, multiple testing corrections substantially reduce the power of the associated tests. In addition, the principle component analysis (PCA), used to quantify the shape variations into several principal phenotypes, further increases the number of tests. As a result, a powerful multiple testing correction for simultaneous large-scale gene-shape association tests is an essential part of determining statistical significance. Bonferroni adjustments and permutation tests are the most popular approaches to correcting for multiple tests within LD based Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) models. However, permutations are extremely computationally expensive and may mislead in the presence of family structure. The Bonferroni correction, though simple and fast, is conservative and has low power for large-scale testing.
resultsWe propose a new multiple testing approach, constructed by combining an Intersection Union Test (IUT) with the Holm correction, which strongly controls the family-wise error rate (FWER) without any additional assumptions on the joint distribution of the test statistics or dependence structure of the markers. The power improvement for the Holm correction, as compared to the standard Bonferroni correction, is examined through a simulation study. A consistent and moderate increase in power is found under the majority of simulated circumstances, including various sample sizes, Heritabilities, and numbers of markers. The power gains are further demonstrated on real leaf shape data from a natural population of poplar, Populus szechuanica var tietica, where more significant QTL associated with morphological shape are detected than under the previously applied Bonferroni adjustment.
conclusionThe Holm correction is a valid and powerful method for assessing gene-shape association involving multiple markers, which not only controls the FWER in the strong sense but also improves statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.