Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25079385›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014

Early prediction of new-onset physical disability after intensive care unit stay: a preliminary instrument.

Anna Schandl, Matteo Bottai, Ulrika Holdar, Elisabeth Hellgren, Peter Sackey

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02679157 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Prognostication of Need for Rehabilitation and Special Support in ICU Survivors. Two Studies Prognosticating Adverse Physical or Psychological Outcome

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2016 to 2016Enrolled573ConditionsPhysical Disability, Depression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety
NCT04317144 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Web-based Follow-up to Former ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2019 to 2027Enrolled330ConditionsPost Intensive Care Unit SyndromeArmsWeb-based follow-up programme., No follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term Survival after Critical Illness: Are We There Yet?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Schandl
Matteo Bottai
Ulrika Holdar
Elisabeth Hellgren
Peter Sackey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany intensive care unit (ICU) survivors suffer from physical disability for months after ICU stay. There is no structured method to identify patients at risk for such problems. The purpose of the study was to develop a method for early in-ICU prediction of the patient's individual risk for new-onset physical disability two months after ICU stay.

methodsIn total, 23 potential predictors for physical disability were assessed before individual ICU discharge. Two months after ICU discharge, out of 232 eligible patients, 148 ICU survivors (64%) completed the activity of daily living (ADL) staircase questionnaire to determine new-onset physical disability.

resultsA total of 95% percent of patients had no ADL reduction prior to ICU admission. 47% (n = 69) of questionnaire responders suffered from worsened ADL. We identified four independent predictors for new-onset physical disability: Low educational level (odds ratio (OR) =6.8), impaired core stability (OR = 4.6), fractures (OR = 4.5) and ICU length of stay longer than 2 days (OR = 2.6). The predictors were included in a screening instrument. The regression coefficient of each predictor was transformed into a risk score. The sum of risk scores was related to a predicted probability for physical disability in the individual patient. The cross-validated area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for the screening instrument was 0.80.

conclusionsEducational level is the single most important predictor for new-onset physical disability 2 months after ICU stay, followed by impaired core stability at ICU discharge, the presence of fractures and ICU stay longer than 2 days. A simple screening instrument based on these predictors can be used at ICU discharge to determine the risk for new-onset physical disability. This preliminary instrument may help clinicians to identify patients in need of support, but needs external validation prior to wider clinical use.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingComorbidityDisability EvaluationEducational StatusFemaleForecastingFractures, BoneHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMarital StatusMental HealthMiddle AgedPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID25079385
PMCPMC4243809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.