Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25079286›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2014

Security and skills: the two key issues in health worker migration.

Posy Bidwell, Pallavi Laxmikanth, Claire Blacklock, Gail Hayward, Merlin Willcox, Wim Peersman, Shabir Moosa, David Mant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Migration Intent of Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kosovo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Posy BidwellDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; pbidwell@tcd.ie.
Pallavi LaxmikanthDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claire BlacklockDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gail HaywardDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Merlin WillcoxDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wim PeersmanDepartment of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Shabir MoosaDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
David MantDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBGhent University · BEUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigration of health workers from Africa continues to undermine the universal provision of quality health care. South Africa is an epicentre for migration--it exports more health workers to high-income countries than any other African country and imports health workers from its lower-income neighbours to fill the gap. Although an inter-governmental agreement in 2003 reduced the very high numbers migrating from South Africa to the United Kingdom, migration continues to other high-income English-speaking countries and few workers seem to return although the financial incentive to work abroad has lessened. A deeper understanding of reasons for migration from South Africa and post-migration experiences is therefore needed to underpin policy which is developed in order to improve retention within source countries and encourage return.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 South African doctors and nurses who had migrated to the United Kingdom. Interviews explored factors influencing the decision to migrate and post-migration experiences.

resultsSalary, career progression, and poor working conditions were not major push factors for migration. Many health workers reported that they had previously overcome these issues within the South African healthcare system by migrating to the private sector. Overwhelmingly, the major push factors were insecurity, high levels of crime, and racial tension. Although the wish to work and train in what was perceived to be a first-class care system was a pull factor to migrate to the United Kingdom, many were disappointed by the experience. Instead of obtaining new skills, many (particularly nurses) felt they had become 'de-skilled'. Many also felt that working conditions and opportunities for them in the UK National Health Service (NHS) compared unfavourably with the private sector in South Africa.

conclusionsMigration from South Africa seems unlikely to diminish until the major concerns over security, crime, and racial tensions are resolved. However, good working conditions in the private sector in South Africa provide an occupational incentive to return if security did improve. Potential migrants should be made more aware of the risks of losing skills while working abroad that might prejudice return. In addition, re-skilling initiatives should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdultClinical CompetenceEmigrants and ImmigrantsEmigration and ImmigrationFemaleForeign Medical GraduatesForeign Professional PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleSafetySouth AfricaUnited Kingdombrain drainde-skillinghealth workerinsecuritymigrationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID25079286
PMCPMC4116620
OpenAlexW2092173900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.