ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2014
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to evaluate clinical practice guidelines.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The quest for optimal and reliable guidelines based on robust evidence for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2021Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Review
- Appraisal of the current guidelines for management of cholangiocarcinoma-using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Review
- Developing a Clinician Friendly Tool to Identify Useful Clinical Practice Guidelines: G-TRUST.Annals of family medicine · 2017Article
- Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods.European radiology · 2016Review
- Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article about harm in surgery.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2016Article
- Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Article
- Evaluating Guidelines: A Review of Key Quality Criteria.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.