ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2014
Bridging the gap between open and minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: the hybrid approach.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.World journal of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Pooled it
- Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Tailored surgery for large adrenal tumors: the minimally invasive to open (hybrid) approach.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A bibliometric method applied to the top one hundred cited articles.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: An experience of 50 cases from a single tertiary care center.Turkish journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Comparison of short-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Developments in pancreatic cancer surgery.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Comparative analysis of opioid use between robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2023Article
- Hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: a single-center experience in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy: Initial single center experience.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2021Article
- Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and borderline malignant periampullary disease compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Article
- [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-a stepwise procedure and learning curve.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive pancreatic surgery has evolved rapidly, but total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been widely adopted owing to its technical complexity. Hybrid laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (HLAPD) combines the relative ease of open surgery with the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the hybrid approach compared with open surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients undergoing either hybrid or open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) at our institution between September 2009 and December 2013. Demographic, operative and oncologic data were collected to compare outcomes between HLAPD and OPD.
resultsOur analysis included 33 patients (HLAPD: n = 13; OPD: n = 20). There were no differences in patient demographics, comorbidities or surgical indications. The HLAPD group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (450 mL v. 1000 mL, p = 0.023) and shorter length of hospital stay (8 v. 12 d, p = 0.025) than the OPD group. Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no differences in postoperative analgesic requirements, Clavien grade I/II or grade III/IV complications or 90-day mortality. Oncologic outcomes showed no significant differences in tumour size, R1 resection rate or number of lymph nodes harvested.
conclusionIn select patients, HLAPD is a safe and effective procedure with comparable outcomes to conventional open surgery. Wider adoption of the hybrid approach will allow a greater number of patients to benefit from a less invasive procedure while facilitating the transition toward purely minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.