Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25078487›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2015

Effect of aldosterone antagonists on blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis.

G Liu, X X Zheng, Y L Xu, J Lu, R T Hui, X H Huang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacotherapy for Essential Hypertension: A Brief Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
  6. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. KDOQI US Commentary on the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Three drugs and still hypertensive: what's left?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G LiuDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
X X ZhengDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Y L XuDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
J LuDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
R T HuiDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
X H HuangDepartment of Special Medical Treatment Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently limited data on which drug should be used to improve blood pressure (BP) control in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies evaluating the anti-hypertensive benefit of aldosterone antagonists (AA) as an add-on therapy in patients with RH. A systematic literature search for eligible studies was conducted until June 2014, using literature databases and hand search. Studies were stratified according to controlled vs uncontrolled design and analyzed using random-effect models. We identified 13 eligible studies involving a total of 2640 patients, consisting of 3 randomized controlled trials, and 10 observational studies without a control group. In controlled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP of -16.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), -30.0 to -3.0) and -4.1 (95% CI, -7.8 to -0.32) mm Hg, respectively, compared with control. In uncontrolled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP of -19.7 (95% CI, -23.2 to -16.2) and -9.1 (95% CI, -10.3 to -7.8) mm Hg, respectively, compared with pre-AA therapy. Subgroup analysis showed that the systolic BP change was more pronounced in patients with baseline systolic BP >150 mm Hg (weighted mean difference (WMD), -23.1 mm Hg) than in patients with ⩽150 mm Hg (WMD, -15.4 mm Hg) (between groups P<0.001), suggesting that the baseline systolic BP was a predictor of the BP response to AA treatment. Furthermore, AA demonstrated a mild increase in serum potassium and creatinine (for both, P<0.001). The findings suggest that AA as an add-on therapy was effective for lowering systolic and diastolic BP in patients with RH.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHumansHypertensionMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25078487
OpenAlexW1992888177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.